PL-310 external MW/LW antenna connection
Hello Laurie (and Byron),
Congratulations on your simple and highly effective
modification of rewiring the PL-310's external antenna plug-in jack,
to allow highly sensitive MW and LW antennas of all types to be
used in boosting the PL-310's performance, Laurie. That's one of the best
ULR modification ideas I've seen recently, and certainly one that should prove
extremely popular!
Because most of my own LW and MW 7.5" loopstick experimentation has been
concentrated on the PL-380 model, I had no option but to design a similar
plug-in "docking port" for the top of the PL-380 cabinet, which would accept the
7.5" plug-in MW loopsticks already sent out to 22 DXers using the PL-360 model.
This is certainly a more involved process than rewiring an existing plug-in
jack, as in your PL-310 modification. For those DXers wishing to use the
PL-310 with any type of external LW or MW plug-in antenna, your
modification is certainly the way to go!
Regarding the avoidance of high AM-band varactor lockup (in the Si4734
chip) when transplanting loopsticks, I did run extensive tests with
various coil inductances and orientations in the 7.5" loopstick PL-380
model, using a signal generator under controlled conditions. The
results may be of interest to you in your PL-310 loopstick experimentation,
Laurie, and are posted at http://www.mediafire.com/?jwdqmdzmi0j .
Thanks again for sharing the details of your highly effective
modification, and we all appreciate your experimental success in
transforming the PL-310 into a very effective DX receiver.
73 and Best Wishes,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
In a message dated 8/14/2010 9:32:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lmann98@... writes:
|
|
Laurence Mann
Hello All,
My apologies if this mod has already appeared in the forum. I recently purchased the PL-310 and, eager to try out some of Gary DeBock's ferrite loopstick ideas, I popped the back off and I noticed, happily, that the 3.5 mm socket for the ext SW/FM antenna is actually a stereo switched socket and that the SW-FM switched connection for the whip antenna is directed to go to the tip of a 3.5 mm stereo plug. The other pair of switched terminals in the socket are for the ring connection to a stereo plug and are conveniently left unconnected on the PCB. Hence I routed the internal loop stick hot connection through these unused terminals so that with no plug in the socket the internal ferrite rod is connected as normal and, when a 3.5 mm stereo plug is connected, the internal ferrite rod is disconnected and the MW/LW input circuit of the radio is available on the ring connection of the plug. The only thing to watch for is potential shorts between the whip antenna base and these pads on the PCB as they are almost coincident with one another when the back of the radio is in place; I put insulating tape over the base of the whip where it overlaps these pads and there has been no shorting problems thus far. Via this plug connection made with a short length (few inches) of RG-174 coax, I tried large external loop sticks around 2,000 uH and they work very well on LW being tuned by the radio's internal cap up to about 400 kHz. For an external MW ferrite rod it is necessary to avoid too much stray capacitance for the upper end of the band if you want the radio's internal cap to tune the ferrite coil, or else optimise with a lower coil inductance than you might otherwise use. A switched inductance coil on the external ferrite rod will doubtlessly be the way to go but the stray C in the interconnect to the radio will be an issue and I may end up going with short open leads to the 3.5 mm plug to allow minimum stray capacitance. The mod also allows for the direct connection of external tuned loops and my external amplified tuned MW/LW ferrite rods work very well through this interface. Regards from Perth, Western Australia Laurie Mann |
|
wa8lcz
Hi Laurie,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Interesting. on the Eton E10 radio. both the tip and the ring are connected to the pc board and a loop antenna can be plugged in, without any mods. thanks for bringing up this point. The PL-310 is exactly the next radio, that i would like to have. the ext ant jack being a major plus, as well as the tuning knob, larger ferrite rod and higher sensitivity. I would like to see all of these points added to radio reviews, they are important considerations. As much as i admire the "dyed in the wool" ultra-liters (i'm also a QRP'er). i prefer antenna experimentation and maximum range DX'ing. Life is too short ...for miniature antennas. byron near Detroit Michigan --- In ultralightdx@..., "lmann98" <lmann98@...> wrote:
|
|
Rik
Gary - could you remember to check if the antenna jack on the new PL-210 also works on AM and/or LW ? - THAT would make it very interesting for those unable to do tiny modifications. - FARMERIK
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., D1028Gary@... wrote:
|
|
Hi Richard,
Sure, I'll be happy to check it.
There seems to be quite a lot of interest in the new PL-210 model, probably
because of the continuing popularity of its E100/ PL-200 predecessor. You would
be surprised to know how many DXers are still using these as their primary ULR
receiver, and how many continuing requests have come in for E100 Slider
loopsticks (about 5 this year, so far).
73, Gary
In a message dated 8/14/2010 3:30:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
farmerik@... writes:
|
|
Kevin S <satya@...>
Hi Laurie:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If/when you get a chance, some photos of your handiwork would be much appreciated! I have no particular talent for soldering, but this might be something I could try, and photos of how it looks before/after would be helpful. Feel free to post them here on the Group Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA Hello All, |
|
Laurence Mann
Hi Kevin,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
No problem. I will post instructions and photos as soon as I can. Best regards, Laurie Mann Perth, Western Australia --- In ultralightdx@..., "Kevin S" <satya@...> wrote:
|
|
Rick Robinson <w4dst@...>
Hello Laurie,
Many thanks for posting your mod for the PL-310. That external antenna connector was what caused me to buy a '310 from anon-co last week. It was shipped on 8/12 and now I have a mod to immediately perform. At the time I ordered it, my interest was mainly for Moxon antennas on the FM band. I see the '310 uses that same loop stick configuration as the '380. I took mine out, rewound it with 40/44 litz wire and put it back in. I have a 280uH crate loop that I'll plug into it when it arrives. Your mod, and Tecsun's unused connectors, sure make antenna experimentation easier. Is it my eyes or is the ferrite bar in the pictures of your '310 slightly rounded on the horizontal length? Rick W4DST |
|
Kevin S <satya@...>
My thanks as well! It looks like something even a novice solderer like
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
myself can safely do. Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA Hello Laurie, |
|
Laurence Mann
Hello Rick and Kevin,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thank you, you're welcome. Rick, you are correct; the ferrite rod in my PL-310 is indeed warped along its length by probably 5-10 degrees and means that it won't sit flat in the recess for which it was designed. That's not unusual in my experience with cheap ferrite rods. Fortunately Amidon stock doesn't suffer this problem. Best regards, Laurie Mann Perth, Western Australia --- In ultralightdx@..., Rick Robinson <w4dst@...> wrote:
|
|
Barry M Gelb
Laurie,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would dearly love to see your PL-310 external antenna mod, however, yahoo tells me the file is unavailable when I click on the link. Do you have any ideas or could you be so kind to email me the file directly at bgcpa54@...? Thanks, Barry Gelb Bayside, NY --- In ultralightdx@..., "lmann98" <lmann98@...> wrote:
|
|
Brian
Laurie,
Like Barry I cannot
access your file either so I too would appreciate a look at it
direct,
at your leisure of course.
Thank you,
Brian, G0NSL-QRP.
|
|
Rick Robinson <w4dst@...>
On 8/18/2010 10:39 AM, bgcpa54 wrote:
Laurie,Sometimes Yahoo will ask you to login before you can download a file from the list website. If Yahoo doesn't prompt you for a login, you may want to do so manually. I had no problems downloading Laurie's file. Rick W4DST |
|
Laurence Mann
Hello Barry and Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Not a problem. Can you please both e mail me off list at lmann98@... if you still need it and I will send you the doc. I can't access your full emails via the list and I have tried via the list to send an attachment file to you individually but I can't figure out how to do this. Cheers, Laurie Mann Perth, Western Australia --- In ultralightdx@..., "brian nsl" <brian.nsl@...> wrote:
|
|
Rick Robinson <w4dst@...>
On 8/17/2010 8:28 PM, lmann98 wrote:
Thank you, you're welcome. Rick, you are correct; the ferrite rod in my PL-310 is indeed warped along its length by probably 5-10 degrees and means that it won't sit flat in the recess for which it was designed. That's not unusual in my experience with cheap ferrite rods. Fortunately Amidon stock doesn't suffer this problem.Nothing like a "warped" ferrite bar to scream cheap. I have 4 8" "twin coil" bar antennas from junked Grundig S-350s. The first one I tried on my G8 was not very impressive. I decided to take it apart and rewind it. When I removed a piece of shrink wrap underneath the coils, I found that the "bar" was made from 2 broken non-matching pieces and held together by the shrink tubing. It did work, but an intact "twin coil" bar antenna was much more impressive. You never know what you are going to come across in some of these radios. Rick W4DST |
|
sarmento2k
Hi Gary
I made some experiments with ferrite rod antennas for MW and have read your work with the ultralight receivers and I'm really impressed with all research and results achieved in this field.
I have one doubt related to the position of the coil, as I see you position it in one edge of the rod, not the center.
I have been trying both configurations (not direct coupled to the receiver, always by magnetically coupling) and I have observed that inductance varies of course, but performance is best when the coil is in the center position.
Is there big signal variation or nulling capacity in this position using the coil directly coupled?
Regards, Sarmento --- In ultralightdx@..., D1028Gary@... wrote:
> > Hello Laurie (and Byron), > > Congratulations on your simple and highly effective modification of > rewiring the PL-310's external antenna plug-in jack, to allow highly sensitive MW > and LW antennas of all types to be used in boosting the PL-310's > performance, Laurie. That's one of the best ULR modification ideas I've seen > recently, and certainly one that should prove extremely popular! > > Because most of my own LW and MW 7.5" loopstick experimentation has been > concentrated on the PL-380 model, I had no option but to design a similar > plug-in "docking port" for the top of the PL-380 cabinet, which would accept > the 7.5" plug-in MW loopsticks already sent out to 22 DXers using the PL-360 > model. This is certainly a more involved process than rewiring an existing > plug-in jack, as in your PL-310 modification. For those DXers wishing to > use the PL-310 with any type of external LW or MW plug-in antenna, your > modification is certainly the way to go! > > Regarding the avoidance of high AM-band varactor lockup (in the Si4734 > chip) when transplanting loopsticks, I did run extensive tests with various > coil inductances and orientations in the 7.5" loopstick PL-380 model, using a > signal generator under controlled conditions. The results may be of > interest to you in your PL-310 loopstick experimentation, Laurie, and are posted > at _http://www.mediafire.com/?jwdqmdzmi0j_ > (http://www.mediafire.com/?jwdqmdzmi0j) . Thanks again for sharing the details of your highly effective > modification, and we all appreciate your experimental success in > transforming the PL-310 into a very effective DX receiver. > > 73 and Best Wishes, > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) > > > In a message dated 8/14/2010 9:32:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > lmann98@... writes: > > > > > Hello All, > My apologies if this mod has already appeared in the forum. > > I recently purchased the PL-310 and, eager to try out some of Gary > DeBock's ferrite loopstick ideas, I popped the back off and I noticed, happily, > that the 3.5 mm socket for the ext SW/FM antenna is actually a stereo > switched socket and that the SW-FM switched connection for the whip antenna is > directed to go to the tip of a 3.5 mm stereo plug. The other pair of switched > terminals in the socket are for the ring connection to a stereo plug and are > conveniently left unconnected on the PCB. Hence I routed the internal loop > stick hot connection through these unused terminals so that with no plug > in the socket the internal ferrite rod is connected as normal and, when a > 3.5 mm stereo plug is connected, the internal ferrite rod is disconnected and > the MW/LW input circuit of the radio is available on the ring connection > of the plug. The only thing to watch for is potential shorts between the > whip antenna base and these pads on the PCB as they are almost coincident with > one anoth er when the back of the radio is in place; I put insulating tape > over the base of the whip where it overlaps these pads and there has been > no shorting problems thus far. > > Via this plug connection made with a short length (few inches) of RG-174 > coax, I tried large external loop sticks around 2,000 uH and they work very > well on LW being tuned by the radio's internal cap up to about 400 kHz. For > an external MW ferrite rod it is necessary to avoid too much stray > capacitance for the upper end of the band if you want the radio's internal cap to > tune the ferrite coil, or else optimise with a lower coil inductance than > you might otherwise use. A switched inductance coil on the external ferrite > rod will doubtlessly be the way to go but the stray C in the interconnect > to the radio will be an issue and I may end up going with short open leads > to the 3.5 mm plug to allow minimum stray capacitance. > > The mod also allows for the direct connection of external tuned loops and > my external amplified tuned MW/LW ferrite rods work very well through this > interface. > > Regards from Perth, Western Australia > Laurie Mann > |
|
Hello Sarmento,
Thank you for your comments about the loopstick experimentation, and of
course we all welcome your contribution to our antenna testing
efforts!
Regarding the position of the directly-connected single coil on the 7.5"
type 61 ferrite rod (such as for the PL-380 and PL-310 modified
models), detailed signal generator tests have been run on the PL-380
using both center-wound and end-wound coils (of varying inductance), and the
results were published in a file at http://www.mediafire.com/?jwdqmdzmi0j .These
tests were run using directly-connected loopstick coils, however, not
the magnetically-coupled ones you are using. I have designed and used both
center-wound (on the PL-360 and PL-380 plug-in loopsticks) and end-wound (on the
PL-380 fixed plastic frame loopsticks) directly-connected coils, and have
had good DXing results with both coil orientations. In my opinion the position
of the coil is mainly a matter of convenience, related to the position of
the Litz wire routing slot in the receiver (i.e. the center position for
the plug-in models, and the end position for the fixed-frame models).
Thanks again for your experimentation, Sarmento, and good luck in your
Ultralight DXing!
73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
In a message dated 8/23/2010 7:00:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
sarmento.campos@... writes:
|
|