Anyone Comments on Sangean DT400W use?


Steve Ponder <n5wbi@...>
 

Rob,

I absolutely love my DT-400W! I started out with the
SRF-59, then got the ultralight bug in a big way and
purchased the SRF-M37V. Not satisfied with its wide
selectivity against my local stations, I purchased a
DT-200V. That led to my purchase of the DT-400W.

IMHO, the DT-400W has great sensitivity AND selectivity
across the band plus it has a dial light which helps
when DX'ing in bed at night. The addition of the US
weather band in place of the VHF analog TV band was a
good choice, too, since those stations will, for the
most part, go dark soon.

I liked my DT-400W so much I bought another one! I
keep the spare one nearby, programmed for 9-khz channels,
just in case I see where DX'ers in the middle of the USA
are catching TA's or TP's. So far, no luck, but there's
always the chance!

I don't think you'll be disappointed by the DT-400W.

73,

Steve N5WBI
Houston TX


Gary DeBock
 

Rob, Kevin and Steve,
 
     I'll share a little information from recent Ultralight hot-rodding experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, that usually prefer to work in secret (Steve R. and me).
 
     The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments, and has recently been modified with both a Slider loopstick (by me) and a Murata CFJ455K5 IF filter (by Steve), creating a compact DXing monster fully equal with the Slider E100's.  The first prototype is being fully evaluated here against the Slider E100's, with very promising results.  For those DXers hoping to eventually modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic terror, the C.Crane SWP would be a good choice (as long as you can live with push-button volume controls).  Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay from "oceansno1" (a.k.a. "anything4home"), who sells decent units at a going rate of about $25.
 
     The DT-400W is also being modified by us, and both the Slider loopstick and filter mods have been created.  The DT-400W is a great Ultralight with typically exceptional wide-band stock sensitivity, and Steve's filter mod will certainly boost its overall performance.  The Slider loopstick also gives its usual nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal capability (as explained in the recent DT-200VX/ DT-400W Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.), but since the radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as effective as the SWP and E100 Sliders for transoceanic DX.
 
     My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive any day now, and there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community, which is hoping for an upgraded E100.  We shall see!
 
     73,  Gary  
 
      
 
In a message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, satya@... writes:

Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.

The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary
DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much
better.

Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated,
although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the
replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.

For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to
issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may want
to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really
well...

Kevin

> Kevin
>
>
> Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR,
> starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz
> increments ?
>
>
> TX
>
> rob
> --- In ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com, satya@... wrote:
>>
>> Hey Rob:
>>
>> The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
>> either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
> the
>> tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those
> increments
>> (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59,
> however, tune
>> continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like,
> limited
>> only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1
> khz
>> steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the
> control is
>> much finer.
>>
>> Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say,
> 1530
>> khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is
> stomping
>> all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
>> further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
>> generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from
> 1520
>> altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able
> to get
>> over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on
> 1530.
>> The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
>>
>> This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on
> TA
>> signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic
> station.
>> For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130
> and
>> 1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away
> from
>> whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
>>
>> So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
>> you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
>> without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big
> problem. If
>> you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in
> your
>> situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few
> channels like
>> 1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New
> York, etc.
>> will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Kevin:
>> >
>> > As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
> few
>> > weeks ago by minutes or hours.
>> > But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
>> > khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
>> > tune in increments?
>> >
>> > rob
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com, satya@ wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey Rob:
>> >>
>> >> The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
> tune
>> > in 1
>> >> khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
>> > especially for
>> >> TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
>> > like you
>> >> may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
>> > about
>> >> it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
> khz
>> >> channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
>> > DXing, even
>> >> domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
> can
>> > really
>> >> help.
>> >>
>> >> If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
> soldering
>> > iron,
>> >> a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
>> > number
>> >> range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
>> > soldering
>> >> skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
>> > filter in
>> >> the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
>> > could see
>> >> how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
> filter
>> > in. I
>> >> see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
>> > number is
>> >> before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
>> >>
>> >> The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
>> > band, and
>> >> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
>> >>
>> >> $.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
> for a
>> >> > digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
>> > Sangean
>> >> > DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
> using
>> > that
>> >> > set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
>> >> >
>> >> > rob
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>



From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.


Rob
 

Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob


satya@...
 

Hey Rob:

The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA

Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob


Rob
 

Steve:

Thanks for the report- so far sounds very good-

rob

-- In ultralightdx@..., "Steve Ponder" <n5wbi@...> wrote:

Rob,

I absolutely love my DT-400W! I started out with the
SRF-59, then got the ultralight bug in a big way and
purchased the SRF-M37V. Not satisfied with its wide
selectivity against my local stations, I purchased a
DT-200V. That led to my purchase of the DT-400W.

IMHO, the DT-400W has great sensitivity AND selectivity
across the band plus it has a dial light which helps
when DX'ing in bed at night. The addition of the US
weather band in place of the VHF analog TV band was a
good choice, too, since those stations will, for the
most part, go dark soon.

I liked my DT-400W so much I bought another one! I
keep the spare one nearby, programmed for 9-khz channels,
just in case I see where DX'ers in the middle of the USA
are catching TA's or TP's. So far, no luck, but there's
always the chance!

I don't think you'll be disappointed by the DT-400W.

73,

Steve N5WBI
Houston TX


Rob
 

Kevin:

As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few
weeks ago by minutes or hours.
But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
tune in increments?

rob


--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:

Hey Rob:

The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can
really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA





Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob


satya@...
 

Hey Rob:

The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59, however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like, limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the control is
much finer.

Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, 1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from 1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on 1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.

This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.

So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.

Kevin

Kevin:

As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few
weeks ago by minutes or hours.
But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
tune in increments?

rob


--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:

Hey Rob:

The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can
really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA





Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob



Gary DeBock
 

Hi Kevin,
 
     So far, I have purchased four E100's from "oceansno.1" on eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per unit, by UPS).
 
     Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully functional, and was of the E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number (fully suitable for all modifications).  I had to look very hard to find any wear at all, and there were only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on two units.  The eBay listing description will tell you whether the unit is in excellent condition, has minor wear, or is non-functional.  They certainly can be trusted, from my experience.  The seller ships the units from Ontario quickly, and they arrive here in about 9 days, by UPS.  I used to think the Durham Radio E100 $44 special was a steal, but these are like highway robbery :>)
 
     73,  Gary
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/26/2009 4:56:34 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, satya@... writes:

Hey Gary:

Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out results.

For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known to be the
right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion set that
is amenable to loopstick transplantation?

Kevin

> Rob, Kevin and Steve,
>
> I'll share a little information from recent Ultralight hot-rodding
> experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, that usually prefer to work
> in
> secret (Steve R. and me).
>
> The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments, and has recently
> been
> modified with both a Slider loopstick (by me) and a Murata CFJ455K5 IF
> filter
> (by Steve), creating a compact DXing monster fully equal with the Slider
> E100's. The first prototype is being fully evaluated here against the
> Slider
> E100's, with very promising results. For those DXers hoping to
> eventually
> modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic terror, the C.Crane SWP
> would be a
> good choice (as long as you can live with push-button volume controls).
> Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay from "oceansno1" (a.k.a.
> "anything4home"),
> who sells decent units at a going rate of about $25.
>
> The DT-400W is also being modified by us, and both the Slider
> loopstick
> and filter mods have been created. The DT-400W is a great Ultralight
> with
> typically exceptional wide-band stock sensitivity, and Steve's filter mod
> will
> certainly boost its overall performance. The Slider loopstick also gives
> its usual nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal capability (as explained
> in the
> recent DT-200VX/ DT-400W Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.),
> but
> since the radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as
> effective
> as the SWP and E100 Sliders for transoceanic DX.
>
> My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive any day now, and
> there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community, which is hoping
> for an
> upgraded E100. We shall see!
>
> 73, Gary
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> satya@sounddsl.com writes:
>
>
>
>
> Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.
>
> The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary
> DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much
> better.
>
> Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated,
> although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the
> replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.
>
> For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to
> issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may
> want
> to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really
> well...
>
> Kevin
>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR,
>> starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz
>> increments ?
>>
>>
>> TX
>>
>> rob
>> --- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_
>> (mailto:ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com)
> , satya@... wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Rob:
>>>
>>> The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
>>> either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
>> the
>>> tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those
>> increments
>>> (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59,
>> however, tune
>>> continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like,
>> limited
>>> only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1
>> khz
>>> steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the
>> control is
>>> much finer.
>>>
>>> Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say,
>> 1530
>>> khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is
>> stomping
>>> all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
>>> further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
>>> generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from
>> 1520
>>> altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able
>> to get
>>> over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on
>> 1530.
>>> The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
>>>
>>> This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on
>> TA
>>> signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic
>> station.
>>> For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130
>> and
>>> 1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away
>> from
>>> whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
>>>
>>> So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
>>> you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
>>> without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big
>> problem. If
>>> you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in
>> your
>>> situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few
>> channels like
>>> 1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New
>> York, etc.
>>> will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Kevin:
>>> >
>>> > As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
>> few
>>> > weeks ago by minutes or hours.
>>> > But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
>>> > khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
>>> > tune in increments?
>>> >
>>> > rob
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_
> (mailto:ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com) , satya@ wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey Rob:
>>> >>
>>> >> The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
>> tune
>>> > in 1
>>> >> khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
>>> > especially for
>>> >> TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
>>> > like you
>>> >> may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
>>> > about
>>> >> it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
>> khz
>>> >> channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
>>> > DXing, even
>>> >> domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
>> can
>>> > really
>>> >> help.
>>> >>
>>> >> If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
>> soldering
>>> > iron,
>>> >> a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
>>> > number
>>> >> range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
>>> > soldering
>>> >> skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
>>> > filter in
>>> >> the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
>>> > could see
>>> >> how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
>> filter
>>> > in. I
>>> >> see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
>>> > number is
>>> >> before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
>>> >>
>>> >> The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
>>> > band, and
>>> >> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
>>> >>
>>> >> $.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
>> for a
>>> >> > digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
>>> > Sangean
>>> >> > DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
>> using
>>> > that
>>> >> > set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > rob
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> **************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between,
> stay
> up-to-date with the latest news.
> (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)
>



From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.


Rob
 

Kevin


Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR,
starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz
increments ?


TX

rob
--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:

Hey Rob:

The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those
increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59,
however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like,
limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1
khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the
control is
much finer.

Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say,
1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is
stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from
1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able
to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on
1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.

This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on
TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic
station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130
and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away
from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.

So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big
problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in
your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few
channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New
York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.

Kevin





Kevin:

As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
few
weeks ago by minutes or hours.
But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
tune in increments?

rob


--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@ wrote:

Hey Rob:

The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
can
really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA





Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob



satya@...
 

Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.

The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary
DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much
better.

Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated,
although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the
replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.

For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to
issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may want
to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really
well...

Kevin

Kevin


Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR,
starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz
increments ?


TX

rob
--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:

Hey Rob:

The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those
increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59,
however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like,
limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1
khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the
control is
much finer.

Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say,
1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is
stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from
1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able
to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on
1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.

This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on
TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic
station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130
and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away
from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.

So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big
problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in
your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few
channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New
York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.

Kevin





Kevin:

As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
few
weeks ago by minutes or hours.
But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
tune in increments?

rob


--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@ wrote:

Hey Rob:

The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
can
really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA





Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob




satya@...
 

Hey Gary:

Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out results.

For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known to be the
right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion set that
is amenable to loopstick transplantation?

Kevin

Rob, Kevin and Steve,

I'll share a little information from recent Ultralight hot-rodding
experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, that usually prefer to work
in
secret (Steve R. and me).

The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments, and has recently
been
modified with both a Slider loopstick (by me) and a Murata CFJ455K5 IF
filter
(by Steve), creating a compact DXing monster fully equal with the Slider
E100's. The first prototype is being fully evaluated here against the
Slider
E100's, with very promising results. For those DXers hoping to
eventually
modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic terror, the C.Crane SWP
would be a
good choice (as long as you can live with push-button volume controls).
Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay from "oceansno1" (a.k.a.
"anything4home"),
who sells decent units at a going rate of about $25.

The DT-400W is also being modified by us, and both the Slider
loopstick
and filter mods have been created. The DT-400W is a great Ultralight
with
typically exceptional wide-band stock sensitivity, and Steve's filter mod
will
certainly boost its overall performance. The Slider loopstick also gives
its usual nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal capability (as explained
in the
recent DT-200VX/ DT-400W Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.),
but
since the radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as
effective
as the SWP and E100 Sliders for transoceanic DX.

My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive any day now, and
there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community, which is hoping
for an
upgraded E100. We shall see!

73, Gary




In a message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
satya@... writes:




Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.

The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary
DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much
better.

Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated,
although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the
replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.

For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to
issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may
want
to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really
well...

Kevin

Kevin


Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR,
starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz
increments ?


TX

rob
--- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_
(mailto:ultralightdx@...)
, satya@... wrote:

Hey Rob:

The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select
either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those
increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59,
however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like,
limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1
khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the
control is
much finer.

Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say,
1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is
stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get
further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will
generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from
1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able
to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on
1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.

This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on
TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic
station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130
and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away
from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.

So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way -
you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing
without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big
problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in
your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few
channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New
York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.

Kevin





> Kevin:

As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
few
weeks ago by minutes or hours.
But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1
khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W
tune in increments?
>
rob


--- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_
(mailto:ultralightdx@...) , satya@ wrote:

Hey Rob:
>>
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad,
especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds
like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think
about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious
DXing, even
>> domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
can
really
help.

If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial
number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest
soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock
filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you
could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial
number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.

The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW
band, and
>> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.

$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA

>>


Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the
Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?

rob

>>

>




**************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between,
stay
up-to-date with the latest news.
(http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)


texnote
 

There is another seller on ebay which is selling new E100's for $45
with free shipping:
http://myworld.ebay.com/zoaxis_electronics/

They actually started selling a few days ago at $34.95. Then promptly
increased the price to $39.95, and today to $45!

I haven't bought from them.

Paul


--- In ultralightdx@..., D1028Gary@... wrote:

Hi Kevin,

So far, I have purchased four E100's from "oceansno.1" on
eBay, at the
average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per unit, by UPS).

Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully functional, and
was of the
E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number (fully suitable
for all
modifications). I had to look very hard to find any wear at all,
and there were
only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on two units. The
eBay listing
description will tell you whether the unit is in excellent
condition, has
minor wear, or is non-functional. They certainly can be trusted,
from my
experience. The seller ships the units from Ontario quickly, and
they arrive here
in about 9 days, by UPS. I used to think the Durham Radio E100
$44 special
was a steal, but these are like highway robbery :>)

73, Gary

for an
upgraded E100. We shall see!

73, Gary


Jim <va3jno@...>
 

Kevin,

I can't say for sure that e100 units from oceansno.1 are all the "right models/serial numbers" but mine was and I haven't seen any posts from anyone claiming to have gotten the "wrong" ones. The radios are all in presealed boxes so it is unlikely that oceansno.1 would be willing to check serial numbers in advance of your bid for you.

Jim

satya@... wrote:


Hey Gary:

Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out results.

For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known to be the
right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion set that
is amenable to loopstick transplantation?

Kevin


Jim <va3jno@...>
 

Mine was serial number E10-0503xxxxxx and cost $9.51 plus $18.00 shipping.
I have certainly been happy with mine so far.
You would have to look extremely hard to see any wear on mine at all. Mine arrived the day at it was shipped, but then it only had to travel about 40 miles and no customs etc. to worry about. (purchased Friday night, shipped Monday, arrived Tuesday).

Jim

D1028Gary@... wrote:


Hi Kevin,
So far, I have purchased four E100's from "oceansno.1" on eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per unit, by UPS).
Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully functional, and was of the E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number (fully suitable for all modifications). I had to look very hard to find any wear at all, and there were only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on two units. The eBay listing description will tell you whether the unit is in excellent condition, has minor wear, or is non-functional. They certainly can be trusted, from my experience. The seller ships the units from Ontario quickly, and they arrive here in about 9 days, by UPS. I used to think the Durham Radio E100 $44 special was a steal, but these are like highway robbery :>)
73, Gary

.


Tom Welch
 

BTW, the Tecsun PL-450 is now being sold
on Amazon.Com by Kaito Electronics. I
purchased a Tecsun PL-600 last week on
Amazon.

Tom Welch
Mesa, AZ USA


Gil Stacy
 

"There is another seller on ebay which is selling new E100's for $45
with free shipping:
http://myworld.ebay.com/zoaxis_electronics/

They actually started selling a few days ago at $34.95. Then promptly
increased the price to $39.95, and today to $45!"

The old "raise your price trick after you sell a few". ;)
Don't know if you were around last year when the "Prison Radio" was
the rage. The seller would dribble a few out on ebay and raise the
price until demand withered. When the price went down, we started
buying again and he'd raise the price. Wonder if he's still selling
the little Sony SRF39FP...
Gil