Rob,
I absolutely love my DT-400W! I started out with the SRF-59, then got the ultralight bug in a big way and purchased the SRF-M37V. Not satisfied with its wide selectivity against my local stations, I purchased a DT-200V. That led to my purchase of the DT-400W.
IMHO, the DT-400W has great sensitivity AND selectivity across the band plus it has a dial light which helps when DX'ing in bed at night. The addition of the US weather band in place of the VHF analog TV band was a good choice, too, since those stations will, for the most part, go dark soon.
I liked my DT-400W so much I bought another one! I keep the spare one nearby, programmed for 9-khz channels, just in case I see where DX'ers in the middle of the USA are catching TA's or TP's. So far, no luck, but there's always the chance!
I don't think you'll be disappointed by the DT-400W.
73,
Steve N5WBI Houston TX
|
|

Gary DeBock
Rob, Kevin and Steve,
Â
    I'll share a little information from recent
Ultralight hot-rodding experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, that
usually prefer to work in secret (Steve R. and me).
Â
    The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments,
and has recently been modified with both a Slider loopstick (by me) and a Murata
CFJ455K5 IF filter (by Steve), creating a compact DXing monster fully equal with
the Slider E100's. The first prototype is being fully evaluated here
against the Slider E100's, with very promising results. For those
DXers hoping to eventually modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic
terror, the C.Crane SWP would be a good choice (as long as you can live with
push-button volume controls). Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay from
"oceansno1" (a.k.a. "anything4home"), who sells decent units at a going rate of
about $25.
Â
    The DT-400W is also being modified by us, and
both the Slider loopstick and filter mods have been created. The
DT-400W is a great Ultralight with typically exceptional wide-band stock
sensitivity, and Steve's filter mod will certainly boost its overall
performance. The Slider loopstick also gives its usual
nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal capability (as explained in the recent
DT-200VX/ DT-400W Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.), but since the
radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as effective as the SWP
and E100 Sliders for transoceanic DX.
Â
    My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive
any day now, and there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community, which
is hoping for an upgraded E100. We shall see!
Â
    73, Gary Â
Â
     Â
Â
In a message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
satya@... writes:
Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.
The CCrane
SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary DeBock recently
reported that later production models seem to be much better.
Also,
the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated, although
since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the replacement for
that model, I bet it's about the same.
For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun
PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to issue the 2009 Shoot-out results
in the coming days/weeks, so you may want to wait until then. I am guessing
that the PL-450 is going to do really well...
Kevin
>
Kevin > > > Great explanation. Any other than E100
recommended recievers ULR, > starting with lowest price first and then
up that have 1khz > increments ? > > >
TX > > rob > --- In ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com,
satya@... wrote: >> >> Hey Rob: >> >> The
M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select >>
either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push >
the >> tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in
those > increments >> (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog
receivers like the SRF-59, > however, tune >> continuously, so
you could dial up whatever frequency you like, > limited >>
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 >
khz >> steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59,
the > control is >> much finer. >> >> Why
would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, >
1530 >> khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...)
is > stomping >> all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over
to 1531 or 1532 to get >> further away from the problem on 1520. The
station on 1530 will >> generally be much more readable, and perhaps
be free of "slop" from > 1520 >> altogether. Depending on the
filtering involved, you may be able > to get >> over to 1533 or
1534 before you start losing the desired station on > 1530. >>
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could
not. >> >> This ability to tune away from problems is
especially important on > TA >> signals, since they will
generally be quite close to a domestic > station. >> For
example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 >
and >> 1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135,
away > from >> whatever domestic channel is giving you the most
problems. >> >> So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to
be detuned either way - >> you're stuck with a fixed on-channel
frequency. For domestic DXing >> without a strong local to contend
with, this may not be a big > problem. If >> you're out in
Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in > your >>
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few > channels
like >> 1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal,
New > York, etc. >> will make adjacent channels more difficult
to hear. >> >>
Kevin >> >> >> >> >> >>
> Kevin: >> > >> > As I posted before I just missed
out on Durham radio E100 sale a > few >> > weeks ago by
minutes or hours. >> > But to show my newness what does
".....unable to tune in 1 >> > khz increments ..." mean? What does
the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W >> > tune in increments? >>
> >> > rob >> > >> > >> >
--- In ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com,
satya@ wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey Rob: >>
>> >> >> The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it
is unable to > tune >> > in 1 >> >> khz
increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, >> >
especially for >> >> TA work. There is a filter mod posted at
DXer.ca, but it sounds >> > like you >> >> may not
be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think >> >
about >> >> it...). As for the ability to tune away from the
standard 9/10 > khz >> >> channels, I personally would
want that capability for serious >> > DXing, even >>
>> domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop
antenna > can >> > really >> >>
help. >> >> >> >> If you're ready to step up,
given that you have wielded a > soldering >> >
iron, >> >> a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the
correct serial >> > number >> >> range) and put the
slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest >> >
soldering >> >> skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly
quickly. The stock >> > filter in >> >> the e100 is
already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you >> > could
see >> >> how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a
narrower > filter >> > in. I >> >> see e100's
on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial >> > number
is >> >> before buying would make sure you're getting what you
need. >> >> >> >> The stock-filtered e100 is an
absolute terror on the domestic MW >> > band, and >>
>> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of
TA's. >> >> >> >> $.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge
Island, WA >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking > for
a >> >> > digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout
that the >> > Sangean >> >> > DT400W is best
bet. However, can anyone comment on actually > using >> >
that >> >> > set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my
second set? >> >> > >> >> >
rob >> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >>
> >> > > >
From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.
|
|
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using that set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|
Hey Rob:
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune in 1 khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can really help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering iron, a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter in. I see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using that set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|
Steve:
Thanks for the report- so far sounds very good-
rob
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-- In ultralightdx@..., "Steve Ponder" <n5wbi@...> wrote: Rob,
I absolutely love my DT-400W! I started out with the SRF-59, then got the ultralight bug in a big way and purchased the SRF-M37V. Not satisfied with its wide selectivity against my local stations, I purchased a DT-200V. That led to my purchase of the DT-400W.
IMHO, the DT-400W has great sensitivity AND selectivity across the band plus it has a dial light which helps when DX'ing in bed at night. The addition of the US weather band in place of the VHF analog TV band was a good choice, too, since those stations will, for the most part, go dark soon.
I liked my DT-400W so much I bought another one! I keep the spare one nearby, programmed for 9-khz channels, just in case I see where DX'ers in the middle of the USA are catching TA's or TP's. So far, no luck, but there's always the chance!
I don't think you'll be disappointed by the DT-400W.
73,
Steve N5WBI Houston TX
|
|
Kevin: As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W tune in increments? rob --- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote: Hey Rob:
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune
in 1 khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can really help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering iron, a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter in. I see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using
that set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|
Hey Rob:
The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push the tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those increments (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59, however, tune continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like, limited only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 khz steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the control is much finer.
Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, 1530 khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is stomping all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from 1520 altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able to get over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on 1530. The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on TA signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic station. For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 and 1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away from whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way - you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big problem. If you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in your situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few channels like 1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New York, etc. will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
Kevin
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Kevin:
As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W tune in increments?
rob
--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:
Hey Rob:
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can really
help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|

Gary DeBock
Hi Kevin,
Â
    So far, I have purchased four E100's from
"oceansno.1" on eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per
unit, by UPS).
Â
    Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully
functional, and was of the E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number
(fully suitable for all modifications). I had to look very hard to find
any wear at all, and there were only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on
two units. The eBay listing description will tell you whether the unit is
in excellent condition, has minor wear, or is non-functional. They
certainly can be trusted, from my experience. The seller ships the units
from Ontario quickly, and they arrive here in about 9 days, by UPS. I used
to think the Durham Radio E100 $44 special was a steal, but these are like
highway robbery :>)
Â
    73, Gary
Â
Â
Â
In a message dated 1/26/2009 4:56:34 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
satya@... writes:
Hey Gary:
Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out
results.
For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known
to be the right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion
set that is amenable to loopstick transplantation?
Kevin
>
Rob, Kevin and Steve, > > I'll share a little information from
recent Ultralight hot-rodding > experiments by two ex-Navy sonar
technicians, that usually prefer to work > in > secret (Steve R.
and me). > > The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments, and
has recently > been > modified with both a Slider loopstick (by
me) and a Murata CFJ455K5 IF > filter > (by Steve), creating a
compact DXing monster fully equal with the Slider > E100's. The first
prototype is being fully evaluated here against the > Slider >
E100's, with very promising results. For those DXers hoping to >
eventually > modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic terror, the
C.Crane SWP > would be a > good choice (as long as you can live
with push-button volume controls). > Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay
from "oceansno1" (a.k.a. > "anything4home"), > who sells
decent units at a going rate of about $25. > > The DT-400W is also
being modified by us, and both the Slider > loopstick > and filter
mods have been created. The DT-400W is a great Ultralight > with >
typically exceptional wide-band stock sensitivity, and Steve's filter
mod > will > certainly boost its overall performance. The Slider
loopstick also gives > its usual nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal
capability (as explained > in the > recent DT-200VX/ DT-400W
Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.), > but > since the
radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as >
effective > as the SWP and E100 Sliders for transoceanic
DX. > > My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive any day
now, and > there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community,
which is hoping > for an > upgraded E100. We shall
see! > > 73, Gary > > > > > In a
message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > satya@sounddsl.com
writes: > > > > > Of the recommended list, only
the e100 has 1 khz tuning. > > The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it
was initially a Turkey, but Gary > DeBock recently reported that later
production models seem to be much > better. > > Also, the
Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated, >
although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the >
replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same. > > For the
CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to > issue
the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may >
want > to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do
really > well... > > Kevin > >>
Kevin >> >> >> Great explanation. Any other than
E100 recommended recievers ULR, >> starting with lowest price first
and then up that have 1khz >> increments
? >> >> >> TX >> >>
rob >> --- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_ >>
(mailto:ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com) >
, satya@... wrote: >>> >>> Hey
Rob: >>> >>> The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10
khz increments (you select >>> either one depending on where
you're at in the world). As you push >> the >>> tune
button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those >>
increments >>> (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the
SRF-59, >> however, tune >>> continuously, so you could
dial up whatever frequency you like, >> limited >>> only
by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 >>
khz >>> steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog
SRF-59, the >> control is >>> much
finer. >>> >>> Why would this be important? If you are
trying to listen to, say, >> 1530 >>> khz, and a strong
local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is >>
stomping >>> all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531
or 1532 to get >>> further away from the problem on 1520. The
station on 1530 will >>> generally be much more readable, and
perhaps be free of "slop" from >> 1520 >>> altogether.
Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able >> to
get >>> over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired
station on >> 1530. >>> The e100 could do this, but the
M37V and DT400W could not. >>> >>> This ability to
tune away from problems is especially important on >>
TA >>> signals, since they will generally be quite close to a
domestic >> station. >>> For example, 1134-Croatia
competes with domestic channels on 1130 >> and >>> 1140,
so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away >>
from >>> whatever domestic channel is giving you the most
problems. >>> >>> So, the M37V and DT400W would not be
able to be detuned either way - >>> you're stuck with a fixed
on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing >>> without a strong
local to contend with, this may not be a big >> problem.
If >>> you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem.
However, in >> your >>> situation, you would probably
have serious problems on a few >> channels like >>> 1510
and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New >> York,
etc. >>> will make adjacent channels more difficult to
hear. >>> >>>
Kevin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
> Kevin: >>> > >>> > As I posted before I
just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a >> few >>>
> weeks ago by minutes or hours. >>> > But to show my
newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 >>> > khz
increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W >>>
> tune in increments? >>> > >>> >
rob >>> > >>> > >>> > --- In
_ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_ > (mailto:ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com)
, satya@ wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hey
Rob: >>> >> >>> >> The DT400W is the
sensitivity champ, although it is unable to >> tune >>>
> in 1 >>> >> khz increments and the stock selectivity is
rather broad, >>> > especially for >>> >> TA
work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds >>>
> like you >>> >> may not be in a position to do that (I
know I wouldn't even think >>> > about >>> >>
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 >>
khz >>> >> channels, I personally would want that capability
for serious >>> > DXing, even >>> >>
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna >>
can >>> > really >>> >> help. >>>
>> >>> >> If you're ready to step up, given that you
have wielded a >> soldering >>> >
iron, >>> >> a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the
correct serial >>> > number >>> >> range) and
put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest >>> >
soldering >>> >> skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly
quickly. The stock >>> > filter in >>> >> the
e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you >>>
> could see >>> >> how it goes before deciding whether or
not to put a narrower >> filter >>> > in.
I >>> >> see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure
what the serial >>> > number is >>> >> before
buying would make sure you're getting what you need. >>>
>> >>> >> The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute
terror on the domestic MW >>> > band, and >>>
>> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of
TA's. >>> >> >>> >> $.02 from Kevin S.
Bainbridge Island, WA >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> > Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as
my first ULR, looking >> for a >>> >> > digital
readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the >>> >
Sangean >>> >> > DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone
comment on actually >> using >>> >
that >>> >> > set long term. OR, any other suggestions
for my second set? >>> >> > >>> >> >
rob >>> >> > >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> > >>>
> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >
**************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in
between, > stay > up-to-date with the latest news. > (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023) >
From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.
|
|
Kevin Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR, starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz increments ? TX rob --- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote: Hey Rob:
The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push
the tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those increments (1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59, however, tune continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like, limited only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 khz steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the control is much finer.
Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, 1530 khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is stomping all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from 1520 altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able to get over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on 1530. The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on TA signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic station. For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 and 1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away from whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way - you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big problem. If you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in your situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few channels like 1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New York, etc. will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
Kevin
Kevin:
As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W tune in increments?
rob
--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@ wrote:
Hey Rob:
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10
khz channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
can really
help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a
soldering iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower
filter in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|
Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.
The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much better.
Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated, although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.
For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may want to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really well...
Kevin
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Kevin
Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR, starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz increments ?
TX
rob --- In ultralightdx@..., satya@... wrote:
Hey Rob:
The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59, however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like, limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the control is
much finer.
Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, 1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from 1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on 1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way - you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
Kevin
Kevin:
As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few
weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W tune in increments?
rob
--- In ultralightdx@..., satya@ wrote:
Hey Rob:
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even
domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna
can
really
help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and
in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
|
|
Hey Gary:
Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out results.
For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known to be the right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion set that is amenable to loopstick transplantation?
Kevin
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Rob, Kevin and Steve,
I'll share a little information from recent Ultralight hot-rodding experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, that usually prefer to work in secret (Steve R. and me).
The C.Crane SWP unit tunes in 1 kHz increments, and has recently been modified with both a Slider loopstick (by me) and a Murata CFJ455K5 IF filter (by Steve), creating a compact DXing monster fully equal with the Slider E100's. The first prototype is being fully evaluated here against the Slider E100's, with very promising results. For those DXers hoping to eventually modify an Ultralight into a 9 kHz transoceanic terror, the C.Crane SWP would be a good choice (as long as you can live with push-button volume controls). Otherwise, pick up an E100 off eBay from "oceansno1" (a.k.a. "anything4home"), who sells decent units at a going rate of about $25.
The DT-400W is also being modified by us, and both the Slider loopstick and filter mods have been created. The DT-400W is a great Ultralight with typically exceptional wide-band stock sensitivity, and Steve's filter mod will certainly boost its overall performance. The Slider loopstick also gives its usual nuclear-powered boost for weak-signal capability (as explained in the recent DT-200VX/ DT-400W Slider Loopstick article posted on DXer.Ca.), but since the radio can't tune in 1 kHz increments, it will never be as effective as the SWP and E100 Sliders for transoceanic DX.
My new PL-450 for the 2009 Shootout should arrive any day now, and there is great anticipation in the Ultralight community, which is hoping for an upgraded E100. We shall see!
73, Gary
In a message dated 1/26/2009 1:19:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, satya@... writes:
Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning.
The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be much better.
Also, the Tecsun PL-450, a new model, has not yet been tested/evaluated, although since Tecsun made the e100, and the PL-450 seems to be the replacement for that model, I bet it's about the same.
For the CCrane SWP and Tecsun PL-450 verdicts, I think Gary is about to issue the 2009 Shoot-out results in the coming days/weeks, so you may want to wait until then. I am guessing that the PL-450 is going to do really well...
Kevin
Kevin
Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR, starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz increments ?
TX
rob --- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_ (mailto:ultralightdx@...) , satya@... wrote:
Hey Rob:
The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push the
tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and down in those increments
(1120, 1130, 1140, etc.). Analog receivers like the SRF-59, however, tune
continuously, so you could dial up whatever frequency you like, limited
only by your fine motor skills. The Eton e100 and others tune in 1 khz
steps, so while it isn't continuous like the analog SRF-59, the control is
much finer.
Why would this be important? If you are trying to listen to, say, 1530
khz, and a strong local on 1520 (say, WWKB's 50,000 watts...) is stomping
all over 1530, it would be nice to nudge over to 1531 or 1532 to get further away from the problem on 1520. The station on 1530 will generally be much more readable, and perhaps be free of "slop" from 1520
altogether. Depending on the filtering involved, you may be able to get
over to 1533 or 1534 before you start losing the desired station on 1530.
The e100 could do this, but the M37V and DT400W could not.
This ability to tune away from problems is especially important on TA
signals, since they will generally be quite close to a domestic station.
For example, 1134-Croatia competes with domestic channels on 1130 and
1140, so it would be nice to be able to tune to 1133 or 1135, away from
whatever domestic channel is giving you the most problems.
So, the M37V and DT400W would not be able to be detuned either way - you're stuck with a fixed on-channel frequency. For domestic DXing without a strong local to contend with, this may not be a big problem. If
you're out in Newfoundland, it's REALLY not a problem. However, in your
situation, you would probably have serious problems on a few channels like
1510 and 1530, and strong regional stations from Montreal, New York, etc.
will make adjacent channels more difficult to hear.
Kevin
> Kevin:
As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a
few
weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What does the Sony M-37 or Sangean 400W tune in increments? >
rob
--- In _ultralightdx@ultralightdxult_
(mailto:ultralightdx@...) , satya@ wrote:
Hey Rob:
>>
The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to
tune
in 1
khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for
TA work. There is a filter mod posted at DXer.ca, but it sounds like you
may not be in a position to do that (I know I wouldn't even think about
it...). As for the ability to tune away from the standard 9/10 khz
channels, I personally would want that capability for serious DXing, even >> domestic, although the judicious use of a passive loop antenna can
really
help.
If you're ready to step up, given that you have wielded a soldering
iron,
a suggestion is to get an Eton e100 (within the correct serial number
range) and put the slider antenna on it. I have VERY modest soldering
skills, and I managed to do the mod fairly quickly. The stock filter in
the e100 is already top-of-the-class for Ultralights, and so you could see
how it goes before deciding whether or not to put a narrower filter
in. I
see e100's on eBay quite a bit, and making sure what the serial number is
before buying would make sure you're getting what you need.
The stock-filtered e100 is an absolute terror on the domestic MW band, and >> in Buffalo you should be able to hear a fair number of TA's.
$.02 from Kevin S. Bainbridge Island, WA
>>
Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking
for a
digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean
DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually
using
that
set long term. OR, any other suggestions for my second set?
rob
>>
>
**************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news. (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)
|
|
There is another seller on ebay which is selling new E100's for $45 with free shipping: http://myworld.ebay.com/zoaxis_electronics/They actually started selling a few days ago at $34.95. Then promptly increased the price to $39.95, and today to $45! I haven't bought from them. Paul --- In ultralightdx@..., D1028Gary@... wrote: Hi Kevin,
So far, I have purchased four E100's from "oceansno.1" on
eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per unit, by UPS).
Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully functional, and was of the E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number (fully suitable for all modifications). I had to look very hard to find any wear at all, and there were only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on two units. The eBay listing description will tell you whether the unit is in excellent condition, has minor wear, or is non-functional. They certainly can be trusted, from my experience. The seller ships the units from Ontario quickly, and they arrive here in about 9 days, by UPS. I used to think the Durham Radio E100 $44 special was a steal, but these are like highway robbery :>)
73, Gary
for an upgraded E100. We shall see!
73, Gary
|
|
Kevin,
I can't say for sure that e100 units from oceansno.1 are all the "right models/serial numbers" but mine was and I haven't seen any posts from anyone claiming to have gotten the "wrong" ones. The radios are all in presealed boxes so it is unlikely that oceansno.1 would be willing to check serial numbers in advance of your bid for you.
Jim
satya@... wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hey Gary:
Thanks for the info! I look forward to the Shott-out results.
For the e100 units from "oceansno1", I presume those are known to be the right models/serial numbers such that you get a single-conversion set that is amenable to loopstick transplantation?
Kevin
|
|
Mine was serial number E10-0503xxxxxx and cost $9.51 plus $18.00 shipping. I have certainly been happy with mine so far. You would have to look extremely hard to see any wear on mine at all. Mine arrived the day at it was shipped, but then it only had to travel about 40 miles and no customs etc. to worry about. (purchased Friday night, shipped Monday, arrived Tuesday).
Jim
D1028Gary@... wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Kevin, So far, I have purchased four E100's from "oceansno.1" on eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping per unit, by UPS). Every E100 was in excellent condition, fully functional, and was of the E10-0505xxxxxx or E110-0504xxxxxx serial number (fully suitable for all modifications). I had to look very hard to find any wear at all, and there were only very minor scratches on the whip antenna on two units. The eBay listing description will tell you whether the unit is in excellent condition, has minor wear, or is non-functional. They certainly can be trusted, from my experience. The seller ships the units from Ontario quickly, and they arrive here in about 9 days, by UPS. I used to think the Durham Radio E100 $44 special was a steal, but these are like highway robbery :>) 73, Gary .
|
|
BTW, the Tecsun PL-450 is now being sold on Amazon.Com by Kaito Electronics. I purchased a Tecsun PL-600 last week on Amazon.
Tom Welch Mesa, AZ USA
|
|
"There is another seller on ebay which is selling new E100's for $45 with free shipping: http://myworld.ebay.com/zoaxis_electronics/They actually started selling a few days ago at $34.95. Then promptly increased the price to $39.95, and today to $45!" The old "raise your price trick after you sell a few". ;) Don't know if you were around last year when the "Prison Radio" was the rage. The seller would dribble a few out on ebay and raise the price until demand withered. When the price went down, we started buying again and he'd raise the price. Wonder if he's still selling the little Sony SRF39FP... Gil
|
|