Re: Potential Ultralight Radio – Grundig Mini 300
bbwrwy
I finally opened the case of my Mini 300 to take a look at what's
inside, but made no adjustments. My guess is alignment would similar to the E100. To disassemble, first remove three screws (two in the battery compartment) and slowly lift the back from the bottom slowly to detach it from a hook at top right (from the back). The hook could be broken if not done correctly. Once unhooked, the back is free to set aside. Now remove the two screws holding the main circuit board to the front of the case. Below it you will notice a second circuit board attached to the front case above the speaker. It's the frequency counter/display circuit and there's no reason to remove it. There is an approximately 5 x 0.7 cm. (1.9" x 0.27 ") ferrite bar antenna at the top of the main circuit board. It looks like a shorten version of the one in the E100. Like the E100, the antenna coil is held in place with wax, so the 600 kHz adjustment should he easy. I didn't identify the 1400 kHz adjustment point - it's one of the eleven on the front of the circuit board. To reassemble the receiver, first secure the main circuit board to the case front ensuring the band switch is in its correct position. Then hook the case back to the front checking to see the battery compartment springs fit back into place. Finally replace the three screws holding the two halves together. My opinion is the tuning control on the Mini 300 keeps it from being used for serious DXing. It's extremely tricky to use and takes a very practiced thumb or forefinger to get it right on the desired frequency. A 3.5 (1.4") cm. tuning control wheel is coupled directly to a small variable capacitor. It would probably benefit from some type of venier tuning apparatus. Richard Allen
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: loggings last night
At 12:47 PM 8/6/2008, ALLEN WILLIE wrote:
Hi Guys, Another Good One Allen....and all I can say to that is......OLE!!!! Wish I could hear that one....and I'm a lot closer to it than you are!! 73...ROB. Robert S. Ross VA3SW Box 1003, Stn. B. London, Ontario CANADA N6A5K1 Antique/Vintage Radio Enthusiast Amateur Radio Stations VA3SW/VE3JFC Defy Physics.....Play Table Tennis!! (Ping Pong with an Attitude) «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loggings last night
Allen Willie
All new Yahoo! Mail - Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: RED ALERT: For Those Interested in E100S !
Steve Ponder N5WBI <n5wbi@...>
John,
I recently purchased my E100 through the offer on the DXer.ca homepage. The radio actually came from the Shortwave Store, which I am guessing is the U.S. side of Durham Radio. Anyway, I checked my E100 against your photos. Mine has the fancy script "eton" lettering (the old version) and has the serial number (E10-0) 610029065. So, I guess mine is one of the "good" ones. Thanks for the alert! 73, Steve N5WBI Houston TX
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RED ALERT: For Those Interested in E100S !
John H. Bryant <bjohnorcas@...>
RED ALERT: Friday,
I opened up my last unmodified E100, planning to do the Full Monty,
align, replace the IF filter and make capable of using both outside
antennas and larger ferrite bars. When I popped the back, I almost had a
heart attack! IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT INSIDE!!! Different
boards, different components, different design of the ferrite loopstick
coil (much like the SRF-59!) The parts count is also lower and
there seem to be efforts to reduce costs in several areas. The only
thing that looks better is the IF Filter.... this E100 reads more nearly
on, but is about 500 hertz low.
When Gary writes his review of the E100 for our series on this wonderful little radio, I'm sure that he will test this particular unit against our more normal ones. Until then, I can't say for sure, but my gut feeling is this "NEW" E100 model is less of a radio than any of our "OLD" ones. Here is what I know for sure: 1. It can't be aligned to peak performance because each of the (2) coils on the ferrite bar is GLUED down. 2. It is a completely different RF design and uses a large major coil jointly with a smaller "tickler" coil. THEREFORE, none of our current ferrite bar replacement strategies can be applied to this new radio design... at least not very easily. 3. At this point, I have no idea whether our IF filter substitution would work in this new circuit. However, it appears that the IF is still 455, so it may work.... tho' why anyone would put a $50 filter in a radio that can't be aligned is not obvious to me. In short, if you are thinking of buying an E100, I would suggest that you make VERY sure that it is not one of these new ones. At least that is the advice that makes the most sense right now. I wanted to talk this over with Durham Radio before I went public with it. Since many of us, including me, had bought our radios there and since Durham has been such wonderful support to the radio hobbies for a long time, I wanted to see what they knew and gather a bit more information before sharing this with the community. Thanks to Rob Ross, I learned that Durham would not be open until today, so I contacted my co-authors Saturday and we did a quick project comparing serial numbers. Here are the results All E100 serial numbers begin E10-0 and the nine-digit number listed below SORT By Serial Number Owner- No O/N Serial Number Comments G Atkins - #1 OLD 503011604 J Bryant - #1 OLD 504016168 Pur. May 08 JHB's Longwire Set G. Atkins - #2 OLD 504019074 J Bryant - #2 OLD 504019367 Pur. June 08 Ferrite Set J Bryant - #4 OLD 505023942 Pur. June 08 JHB pur. Parts Set R Ross - #1 OLD 704029648 Pur. Durham April 08 G DeBock - #1 OLD 704029656 Pur. Durham April 08 w/Rob Ross Stock R Ross - #2 OLD 704029682 Pur. Durham late July 08 K Schanilec OLD 704029693 Anomalous Ferrite Loop stick maybe "NEW"? G DeBock - #2 OLD 704030008 Pur. Durham June 08 Slider + CFJ455K5 Filter G DeBock - #3 OLD 704030009 Pur. Durham June 08 Slider J Bryant - #3 OLD 704030013 Pur. Durham June 08 (Fried by JHB) J Bryant - #5 "NEW" 709030292 Pur. Durham late July 08 As you can see, my NEW and different model has a serial number substantially higher than any of the others in our small early inquiry. Happily, there are a few subtle external differences that can distinguish OLD and NEW, as well. I'll insert one picture here. If you cannot see this, there are several photos in our Photo area. Today, I talked to "Jamie" at Durham, who was very helpful. I got the sense that they still have several hundred and he pulled a new case of twenty and looked in the battery compartment. The serial number was VERY safe, in the 504 or 505 series. I discussed how important the difference between the two sub-models is to us Ultralighters and he was quite sympathetic. I asked if they could possibly check the serial numbers before sales for those of us who request such and he indicated that they would try to help us, if we would request such at the time of purchase. Most helpful! Obviously Durham Radio is a "real radio company!" If you are buying on EBAY, I think that you should make very sure that the radio pictured is the EXACT radio that is being offered. If it is so, then you can check the typeface for the difference in the two sub-models.... At least we hope that no new boards were put in old cases. Wow! I would be happy to gather more serial numbers in the database and post it. They are located in the battery compartment and easily accessed by removing the batteries. We are particularly interested in hearing from people who own radios in the 704 and higher series and would love to hear if anyone else has a set with the new elegant block lettered typeface. I'll upload pictures of the interior comparison as well as the typeface to our Photo Area in a few minutes.
John B.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Adding het detection to your Ultralight receiver
bbwrwy
Interestingly I was also thinking about the possibility of using a BFO
with an ULR this afternoon. I discovered an interesting article at www.crystalradio.net/crystalsets/bfo/Mike_Tuggle_BFO_Article.doc a few minutes before reading your post. It includes a BFO circuit that someone might be able to adapt to an ULR - most likely the E100. Richard Allen
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adding het detection to your Ultralight receiver
dhsatyadhana <satya@...>
Hi all:
One thing that ultralights don't have, by definition, is a BFO by which a heterodyne may be heard to indicate that a weak station is there. With the Sony 2010 or other communications receiver, tuning slightly away from 774 khz (say to 775 khz) with the BFO on (i.e., in SSB mode) will produce a 1 khz het which lets you know that JOUB- Japan is there. Simply jumping up and down the dial by 9 khz will conveniently produce a het to show that a TP/TA is present on a given channel. This can serve as a "spotter" receiver to indicate when a prize catch can be had on another receiver. As discussed at http://www.qsl.net/vu2msy/listening.htm and perhaps elsewhere, you can induce a beat frequency into your Ultralight with another radio! This is easily done with two SRF-59's (and we all have at least two of them...). For example: 1. Tune the listening receiver to a station at 730. 2. Place the BFO unit directly on top or underneath. 3. With the BFO unit turned ON, and volume all the way down, tune it about 50 khz lower (i.e., to 680 khz or so). The 50 khz IF on the SRF-59 means that, on the BFO unit, a beat frequency of 730 khz is being produced in order to tune in 680 khz. 4. Since the 730 broadcast signal on the listening unit and the 730 khz beat frequency on the BFO unit are now colliding with each other, you should hear a fairly pronounced heterodyne! 5. Move the BFO unit around a bit to adjust the intensity of the het. The 55-khz (or so) IF on the SRF-59 family works well, because you can cover nearly the entire dial. For instance, tuning the BFO unit to 525 khz (its lower limit) produces a beat frequency of around 580 khz, which can then be fed to the listening unit. Contrast this with using a BFO unit with a 455 khz IF: the lowest beat frequency it can produce is (455 + 525 =)980 khz, meaning that the listening unit can only be tuned as low as 980 khz while still being able to take advantage of the het production. What I have noticed is that the Sony S5W, with its humongous RF stage, puts out a huge BFO signal, which may be more convenient if you are working the upper part of the band - you can be several feet away and still pick up the beat frequency! As such, the enhanced RF stage on a super-modified SRF-39 might make it a good BFO unit for an Eton E100 listening unit. On thing to watch - you will likely notice that sensitivity on the listening unit goes down. What appears to be happening is that the BFO signal from the BFO unit, when received on the listening unit, causes the AGC on the listening unit to reduce the overall gain. In other words, if the broadcast signal and BFO signal are about the same, the AGC will cut the gain in half in order to keep what it believes is a constant audio level. Therefore, judiciously place the BFO unit a little farther away in order to keep the gain up while at the same time still inducing a beat frequency into the listening unit. Alternately, I suppose you could super-modify your listening unit to switch out the AGC! Being somewhat inland and not prone to getting up a 4:30 AM (lying prone often seems preferable, and unlike John B. I don't have cats to push me out of bed), I haven't been able to try this out with actual trans-oceanic signals, and so I would be delighted if someone out there (Alan in NF??) would give this a try to see how useful it is. 73 - Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: loggings last night 8/4/08
Allen and Rob,
The West Coast Ultralight TP Chaser group salutes
Allen for his remarkable Transatlantic DX accomplishments with his stock
Ultralights. We should all be so lucky.
Here on the Left Coast, we take our deviously
modified E100's to the beach for a few mornings of DXing at the nasty hour
of 0500, and if we are extremely lucky, we come away with a rare new Pacific
country such as Fiji or Tonga (but usually end up just listening to the same old
Aussiea and Kiwis over and over). It's enough to make someone seriously
consider immigration to The Rock (or more likely, seriously consider
even more devious ways to modify the E100).
73, Gary Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: loggings last night 8/4/08
At 10:27 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
Allen Willie Allen...You continue to amaze us all with your Superb Loggings of Trans Atlantic Stations!! You have a set a standard that will be hard to duplicate by any of us. Your continued efforts to Promote the Ultralight DXing Hobby are appreciated by all who partake in this strange Subculture of AM BCB DXing!!! You have done us all proud...and although it is now expected that your loggings will be spectacular.....it still amazes what you are able to hear from the THE ROCK!! Keep up the great DX Allen........it will be interesting to see just what is and isn't possible on an Ultralight!! 73...ROB. Robert S. Ross VA3SW Box 1003, Stn. B. London, Ontario CANADA N6A5K1 Antique/Vintage Radio Enthusiast Amateur Radio Stations VA3SW/VE3JFC Defy Physics.....Play Table Tennis!! (Ping Pong with an Attitude) «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hot-Rodded Sony ICF-SW7600GR Performance Report
Hello Guys,
The Sony ICF-SW7600GR is compact digital SSB
portable with reasonably good MW performance, using a stock 4.75" x .37"
fixed-coil loopstick for the 530-1700 kHz frequencies. At $134.80 plus
shipping from Amazon.com (via Gigabargain), it has excellent Synch detector
function for a portable, as well as decent shortwave performance.
Having a sudden need for a very compact
SSB-equipped MW portable to use as a "spotting receiver" for South Pacific DX
targets during a short Ultralight Radio DXpedition to Grayland, Washington, I
became intrigued with the idea of replacing the SW7600GR's stock loopstick
with a 7.5" Amidon ferrite bar, wound with 40/44 Litz wire. This
combination of MW frequency-optimized ferrite and Litz wire has provided
huge sensitivity gains not only in the SRF-39FP and E100 Ultralight models, but
also in the larger ICF-2010 traditional DX portable. Upon checking the
stock SW7600GR loopstick, it was found to be a smaller-sized copy of the
ICF-2010 loopstick system, having a fixed (non-alignable) larger coil and a
smaller tickler coil, to optimize spurious signal rejection.
The SW7600GR loopstick was easily replaced
with a 7.5" x .5" Amidon ferrite bar-based antenna, wound with 40/44 Litz wire
to match the 983 mh inductance of the stock main coil. The
sensitivity improvement was very dramatic, boosting the weak-signal performance
of this compact portable past that of a stock ICF-2010. This was a total
reversal of its performance prior to the modification, in which the
SW7600GR was clearly inferior to the stock 2010 on all MW frequencies.
At Grayland, the newly hot-rodded SW7600GR
performed very well as an SSB "spotting receiver," with different TP
station frequencies stored in memory, easily accessed by pushing single
buttons. SSB carrier strength of the "targets" could be quickly
checked, and the direction of the received signal could be easily determined by
the new loopstick's excellent nulling ability.
On the domestic frequencies, the newly modified
SW7600GR provided lots of sensitivity, with easy loggings of KPUA-670 and
KGU-760 in Hawaii. For the 9 kHz split targets in the South Pacific,
however, the modified SW7600GR's sensitivity alone wasn't quite adequate to keep
up with the modified Eton E100 Ultralight, which had a Murata
CFJ455K5 premium ceramic IF filter installed (the same narrow filter as in
the Eton E1). The modified E100 could split off Fiji-639, Tonga-1017,
2ZB-1035 and 2YA-567 significantly better than could the modified SW7600GR,
which had to contend with more domestic slop.
Despite this, the compact Sony's function as an
SSB "spotting receiver" was excellent, and it directed the AM-mode
only Eton E100 to the "hot" frequencies very well. 9 kHz SSB carrier
strength can usually be checked even in the presence of domestic splatter,
and the SW7600GR was great for this purpose.
For domestic DXers, this modified ICF-SW7600GR
would provide a great sensitivity improvement over the stock model, for a very
reasonable cost in parts (under $30 for the ferrite bar, Litz wire and other
items). The modification is easy to perform, and the unit remains
very compact (a photo is on the Ultralightdx Yahoo group site in the "Roll Your
Own DXing Monster" album). Nulling ability is excellent, and the
loopstick's external mounting provides extremely quiet reception compared to the
stock antenna, crammed as it is inside a cramped cabinet next to the SW whip
antenna. The full modification article should be written shortly, for
those interested in this impressive performance upgrade.
For serious 9 kHz split-frequency DXers, however,
a premium IF filter upgrade would be very helpful in chasing TP's and
TA's next to domestic splatter. The good news is that with an IF of 455
kHz, the ICF-SW7600GR can be modified with the same premium ceramic filter that
has transformed the tiny E100 into a DXing sensation this summer. Well,
there's always a nice-to-do project that is on the drawing board...
73, Gary
DeBock Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Potential Ultralight Radio – Grundig Mini 300
John H. Bryant <bjohnorcas@...>
Steve,
Thanks for the excellent review of the 300. I was interested enough that I went to the eham reviews to read what other users had to say and most were reasonably positive. However, one user who seemed knowledgeable noted quite a number of images and even some breakthrough from shortwave broadcasters. He was unsure as to whether he had a defective, mis-aligned unit or whether this ight be a characteristic. It might be worth taking a look at that problem, if you didn't. Here are the comments: My Grundig Mini 300PE performs very well with the exception of the MW (standard AM) band. My set experiences poor image rejection. Ex. a station on several miles away (WTOP Wheaton MD) 1500Khz can clearly be heard at a tuning of 590Khz. That tells that this radio uses an IF freq. of 540Khz. I was surprized initially at all the whistles and hetrodynes that occurred at night time at frequencies above 1000Khz. With some investigation, I've discovered that this radio is receiving short wave transmissions from the 5 to 7 Mhz band. At a tuning of 1082.5Khz, WWCR on 5.070Mhz is tremendously strong. By some simple arithmetic calculations, it appears that the third harmonic of the local oscillator (at the 1082.5Khz tuning) is at 4.62Mhz--below 5.070Mhz by the IF frequency of 450Khz. For the math to work exactly right, the exact receiver tuning would need to be 1.090Khz, so that the radio's frequency display may be a bit off by -7.5Khz. Similarly, I receive other shortwave stations where there is no conflicting AM broadcaster. The FM/SW telescoping antenna seems to be active on MW; touching it attenuates reception. It's as though there is no front end tuning. This is poorer AM performance than a '60s shirt pocket six transistor radio. It's hard to believe that this performance is typical for this radio. If I got a bad one, someone please say so. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/4761?page=2 No one responded to this man, either way. Thanks for your work!
John B.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loggings last night 8/4/08
Allen Willie
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: new country logged
MarkWA1ION
In Oct. 1991 when I was on a business trip to Mountain View, CA -
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
still some distance from the shore - I had no problem hearing Japan on 774 on a "barefoot" Sony ICF-2010 in my hotel room around local dawn. I think 747 and 828 were making showings too. Mark Connelly, WA1ION - Billerica, MA, USA
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Dennis Gibson" <wb6tnb@...>
wrote: I'm almost within spitting distance of the Pacific Ocean but have never really tried for any TP's. The problem is that staying up until prime DX time messes up my body clock. Even on weekends I can't stay up long enough. If I do I can't wake up well enough on Monday morning. I have good radios; Sony ICF-2010 (stock), all three models of Superadio, both Realistic TRF models, Radio Shack DX-398 (Sangean ATS-909; a big disappointment) and a few more. I also have both the Sony SRF-39FP and 59; both tweaked by Gary. I have a Select-a-Tenna, which works well. I can't put up any outdoor antennas. I don't know if I have much of a chance of hearing any exotic DX. I have three locals (1290, 1340 and 1490) one mile away (all on the same tower!) but they are relatively low power; none more than 1 KW. I've always been impressed at the TA's you hear but don't know if I have a chance of hearing anything spectacular from here with the equipment I have. --- In ultralightdx@..., "MarkWA1ION" <MarkWA1ION@...> wrote: seashore. the difference in signal strengths versus what I notice at coastal sitestop- gun shore sites in Rockport, Rowley, Duxbury, Eastham, etc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Potential Ultralight Radio – Grundig Mini 300
Hello Steve,
Thank you for your efforts in reviewing the
Grundig Mini 300. The E100 itself will be reviewed as part of the
Midsummer Ultralight Radio Shootout, along with the Sony SRF-M97V, SRF-S84,
SRF-M37W and DT-400W.
73, Gary
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Modified E100 South Pacific DX mp3's
Thanks Guy,
Your suggestion and procurement of the Murata
narrow filters made a huge difference in the effectiveness of the modified
E100's. Without the narrow filters (even with great sensitivity), the
modified E100 would have a tough time dealing with un-nullable domestic QRM, in
chasing the DU's at Grayland.
The combination of great sensitivity and
great selectivity has produced results that surprise us all.
73, Gary
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Modified E100 South Pacific DX mp3's
Gary, Great going with those super catches! I will have to check out the recordings. That was quite a feat and must have been a lot of fun.
I look forward to getting closer to the coast again...I am in St. Louis right now. ;^) 73, Guy Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: D1028Gary@... Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:44:14 EDT To: <ultralightdx@...> Subject: [ultralightdx] Modified E100 South Pacific DX mp3's
Hello Guys, The modified E100 (with a 7.5" slider loopstick and narrow filter) really provided some excitement in Grayland, WA on July 31st, receiving Fiji-639, Tonga-1017, 2ZB-1035 in New Zealand, and KPUA-670 in Hawaii. I wish that all of you could have experienced the fun of chasing Ultralight South Pacific DX on an exceptional morning! Uploaded to the Ultralightdx group site were a couple of mp3's from that superb session, of Fiji-639 and 2ZB-1035. The Fiji-639 mp3 starts off with a marginal mumbling ID in Pidgin English, but quickly gets stronger with Polynesian choral music. The 2ZB-1035 mp3 was my first recorded ID from New Zealand, despite hearing 2YA-567 and 2YC-657 many times with sleep-inducing EZL music. John Bryant had already received all of these stations with an E100 hooked up to his 4-element Wellbrook Array, but I doubt that he had as much fun as I did, using a 7.5" slider loopstick at a picnic table :>) 73, Gary Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modified E100 South Pacific DX mp3's
Hello Guys,
The modified E100 (with a 7.5" slider loopstick
and narrow filter) really provided some excitement in Grayland, WA on July 31st,
receiving Fiji-639, Tonga-1017, 2ZB-1035 in New Zealand, and KPUA-670 in
Hawaii. I wish that all of you could have experienced the fun of chasing
Ultralight South Pacific DX on an exceptional morning!
Uploaded to the Ultralightdx group site were a
couple of mp3's from that superb session, of Fiji-639 and 2ZB-1035. The
Fiji-639 mp3 starts off with a marginal mumbling ID in Pidgin English, but
quickly gets stronger with Polynesian choral music. The 2ZB-1035 mp3
was my first recorded ID from New Zealand, despite hearing 2YA-567
and 2YC-657 many times with sleep-inducing EZL music.
John Bryant had already received all of these
stations with an E100 hooked up to his 4-element Wellbrook Array, but I doubt
that he had as much fun as I did, using a 7.5" slider loopstick at a picnic
table :>)
73, Gary
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Potential Ultralight Radio – Grundig Mini 300
satya@...
Hey Steve:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for the Grundig Mini 300 review! I have seen this unit around, and have always wondered how it performs. The analog/digital tuning which allows 1 khz fine tuning would be a nice thing to have. Your testing methodology is great - I wish I was so thorough :-). It looks like the 300's no substitute for the "Jumbo Shrimp" Eton E100 but still manages to hold its own. Given the uneven sensitivity results, I wonder if an alignment would perk it up? As for selectivity, since the E100 is the stock selectivity champ, it wasn't a fair fight: do you have a Sony SRF 39 or 59 to compare selectivity with? That may be an intersting quick comparison. (***Hey Gary/John/Guy*** - I wonder if the 300 would accept a Murata filter...) I look forward to when you get the time and energy to keep going on your stable of Ultralights to see how the other little guys fare! 73 - Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA
Based on the fact that my totally non-scientific results returned over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential Ultralight Radio – Grundig Mini 300
Steve Ponder N5WBI <n5wbi@...>
Radios
Radio Reviewed: Grundig Mini 300 (unmodified) Radio Used for Comparison: Eton E-100 (unmodified) Description of the Grundig Mini 300 Frequency Coverage: AM (525-1710 kHz), FM (88-108 MHz), SW1/49M (5.95-6.20 MHz), SW2/41M (7.00-7.30 MHz), SW3/31M (9.50-9.95 MHz), SW4/25M (11.60-12.10 MHz), SW5/22M (13.60-13.80 MHz), SW6/19M (15.10-15.80 MHz), and SW7/16M (17.50-17.90 MHz). Size: Fits in your pocket. Dimensions are 2.6 x 7 x 1.2 inches (65 x 170 x 23 mm). Weight without batteries is 4 ounces (127 g). Tuning: Analog with digital display. Tuning is accomplished by means of thumbwheel on right side of radio. MW tunes in 0.5 kHz increments. FM tunes in 50 kHz increments. Shortwave tunes in 5 kHz increments. Bands are selected by a 9-position slide switch on the left side of the radio. FM Stereo is available through the headphone jack, located on the left side of the radio just below the band switch. Antennas: FM and Shortwave reception use a telescopic antenna that is located on the left side of the radio. There is a molded part of the radio case that extends approximately 2.125 inches (57 mm) above the top of the radio to protect the antenna. Unfortunately, it also prevents the antenna from swiveling or turning. You must occasionally orient the entire radio for best FM reception. Fully extended, the telescopic antenna adds another 19.75 inches (502 mm) to the overall height of the radio. This often causes the radio to tip over. The AM band uses an internal ferrite bar loop antenna oriented parallel to the top of the radio. Power Source: The radio operates on 2 AA batteries. There is no provision for an external DC power adapter. Review Strategy I checked the Mini 300 for (1) sensitivity and (2) selectivity using the Eton E-100 as my base for comparion. For the sensitivity portion of the review, I selected two stations on the high end of the AM dial, one a local TIS station on 1610 kHz, the other a semi-local on 1460 kHz. I also selected two stations on the low end of the AM dial, both semi-locals, one on 550 kHz, the other on 560 kHz. I also threw in another TIS station on 830 kHz and a station in a neighboring state on 870 kHz that can be heard well at my location. The sensitivity review was performed during the middle afternoon, before local sunset started affecting the signals. For the selectivity portion of the review, I chose two local stations, one on 740 kHz, the other on 1480 kHz, that are (IMHO) notorious for splattering their immediate adjacent channels at night. This is due, not to the fault of the stations, but to the quality of the radio - hence the reason for the test. So, I compared the Mini 300 and the E-100 on 730, 750, 1470, and 1480 kHz at approximately 2 hours after local sunset in order to give the station's signals time to settle down into their nighttime strengths. Grading Scale To "quantify" my completely subjective evaluations, I used the same scale that Gerry Thomas of Radio Plus uses in his evaluations: 5 - Local (all background noise "quieted") 4 - Easily Readable, but not like a local 3 - Readable, but with some effort 2 - Intermittently readable 1 - Present, but not readable 0 - Not detectable
Based on the fact that my totally non-scientific results returned over 50% in both categories (sensitivity and selectivity), I think the Grundig Mini 300 world be a worthy addition to the list of Ultralight Radios! Disclaimer: The opinions stated in this review are myown. I personally own all of the radiosthat I reviewed. Measurements,calculations, and estimates were performed strictly by ear and reflect my bestjudgment alone. 73 and Great DX, Steve N5WBI Houston TX
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: new country logged
John H. Bryant <bjohnorcas@...>
Dennis,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Ya just gotta try some of the Pacific stuff at dawn.... If nothing else, wait for the middle of the Asian season in late September and October... With DST and sunrise so late, even night owls have a shot! John B. At 02:27 AM 8/2/2008 +0000, you wrote:
I'm almost within spitting distance of the Pacific Ocean but have
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|