Date   

Re: Sangean DT-250 review

Paul Blundell
 

Well done on creating this, I can't understand聽it but it looks good.


On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:50 PM Jorge Garz贸n via groups.io <iberiaDX=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
I have made my first review of an ULR receiver, the Sangean DT-250. Can be seen here:聽https://youtu.be/BABe620f-3M

It's in Spanish, and could also be used to get better Spanish language skills for DXers abroad. 馃槈

隆Buen DX!聽

Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX



--
Paul


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Paul Blundell
 

Thanks for the information, I follow your adventures on your blog and some other groups.

Over the next few weeks I am planning on undertaking some more testing to see what, if anything is causing some of my issues, if it is inside the house, I will see what I can do about it. As my wife and kids have so much electrical "stuff", it might be a bit of a battle.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:47 PM VK5PAS <simmopa@...> wrote:
Hi Paul,

In the middle of this year I moved house from the town of Mount Barker in the Adelaide Hills, to a rural property at Ashbourne south of Adelaide.

My noise floor at Mount Barker was S7 on the 40m band on my dipole antenna.

At Ashbourne I have zero man made noise.聽 I can hear a pin drop.

BUT, if the power outlet for our TV is switched on in the main living area, the noise jumps up to S5-6.聽 That is easily fixed.聽 If I'm on the radio, my wife (who is also an amateur) watches the other TV at the other end of the house, which generates no noise.

We also recently had an outdoor NBN extender installed, to allow internet to our shed.聽 When that was installed the noise floor went up to S7.聽 Needless to say that has now been removed, and I am back down to zero noise again.聽

Even our reverse cycle heating and cooling, when on, generates some noise on the bands.

Something as small as a power outlet or NBN in your own home, can cause sufficient noise to be very annoying.聽 Yet alone, everyone else's home surrounding you.

You might want to have a look at QRM.guru.聽 Here is the link.....

https://qrm.guru/

Good luck.

Regards,聽

Paul VK5PAS.



--
Paul


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Phillip Fimiani
 

I've had several interesting investigative challenges since moving into my new house. Its loaded of course with lots of QRM. Even in the audio range. I once chased an intermittent alarm after moths only to find out it was my weather radio out in the garage! (a std weekly test!).

Or a refrigerator and a small freezer that lays against the wall and vibrates when it shuts down and you here it in the walls!!

But radio wise QRM is rampant. Anything with a wall wart or even a power supply is suspect. I have switched to LED lamps in the house for energy savings, but even the old halogens under the kitchen cabinets are noisy! Then you have the computer controlled appliances, stoves, ovens, washers, dryers.聽 Unless the product has a CE approval or the later UL 544 compliance etc, its going to be a noise source. And many cheap products fall into that category.

There was an issue a while back with industrial grade grow lamps. Being in an industrial area, it didn't matter. But when people started buying them to grow there "plants" at home, they were horrible RF radiators, and the FCC and the DEA didn't have a hard time finding the illegal culprits!

Then you have the power line carrier transmissions! Not the power itself, but the digital information it carries! Ask any techy in England. I don't know about the rest of Europe. But here too, my electric meter is remote read, another PLC.

Recently the town just installed an improved remote reader for my water meter. We have drive by meter readings... A little antenna now sticks out of the buried water meter!

My power lines are buried, as are any new housing development. Along with every other service coming to the house. Then there's the sprinkler system and its controller for the lawn...

My 2 HVAC heat pumps in the attic where I want to put my antennas for transmit (QRP) and receive...

The list goes on and on...

But the large AC power transformer locations are not near me, except of course for the transformer in my front yard! (;-(. I'm not so much concerned about the local QRM as I am about the house QRM. Maybe smaller in energy but more stronger and annoying to my listening.

Someday I'll make a DF antenna and search my property... LOLOL.. Ill have to buy up lots of ferrite beads!

Mortimer says "Stay Safe"
Best Regards
Phil
KD2HTN / WA2069SWL
Long: 34.210293 Lat:-78.057048
FM04xf 30dl
______________________________



On Monday, December 7, 2020, 6:34:50 AM EST, radiojayallen <radiojayallen@...> wrote:


Yes, you can walk around your neighborhood and listen. And driving around you will hear how the noise from overhead lines varies. Living in an area with underground utilities is the best scenario and I have been lucky enough to have that both in my old home and in the new one.

I do have one strange noise source in my new house I haven't figured out yet but luckily it is infrequent. On parts of the AM band I will hear a squeal which almost totally blanks out medium strength stations on 590 and 630 KHz but it only seems to happen once or perhaps twice a day for about 2 minutes. Some days I never hear it. Makes it tough to isolate...really odd though.

--
73
Phil
KD2HTN / WA2069SWL
Long: 34.210293 Lat:-78.057048
FM04xf 30dl


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Jorge Garz贸n
 

That's very interesting R茅my and shoul be named as a new VHF propagation way. Perhaps powerline duct?聽

Merci et 脿 bient么t !聽

Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


En lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2020 11:58:56 CET, R茅my Friess <rfriess@...> escribi贸:


Hi everyone out there,

Powerlines, appliances etc... do indeed generate a lot of QRM and can be a nuisance, but sometimes powerlines can also be pretty useful for the hobby.

I live in the east of France and I drive around a lot in the area and I found out that on the motorway, right where a 220 000 volt power line crosses the way, the FM DX picture changes completely.

The power line runs SE-NW, roughly in a direction from Freiburg (south-west Germany) to Luxembourg.

Every time I drive near that line, the local station on 106.6 MHz gets wiped out by a station from Germany, an another local station on 93.3 MHz is also blown away by one in Luxembourg (300 kms away). In both cases the distant signal is very stable. The RDS data are even present on the display of the car radio.

It seems the powerline acts like a duct, and the signals propagate along it. Also, and this might explain the thing partly, it consists of 6 cables with a 3 metre interval (1位)聽 between them.

Unfortunately I can't park the car underneath the line to explore the whole FM band, but I'm pretty sure the are some more DX stations to be found that way.

When that corona lockdown nonsense is over I'll try and find a place in the countryside near the line and use my Tecsun PL-380 to see what I can get.

73, R茅my.



Re: TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

hamrad45
 

Awesome review.聽 When I did a search for the 1733, I found the 1780 which looks very interesting.聽 Have tested it?

Have a great day,

Tom Stiles (hamrad88 - YouTube)


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Michael.2E0IHW
 

We are in rural SW England and聽 have overhead power and telephone lines,
the latter swamping HF reception with VDSL outspew.

Recently, a new 11kV-230V transformer was installed in the adjacent field.
Even before our houses were re-connected, QRM jumped up to about S6-7.
In the 8 hours without mains power, noise was S1.
(The friendly chaps also put their digger shovel through our water-supply pipe...)

Michael UK

On 07/12/2020 11:34, radiojayallen wrote:
Yes, you can walk around your neighborhood and listen.
And driving around you will hear how the noise from overhead lines varies.
...

  


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

radiojayallen
 

Yes, you can walk around your neighborhood and listen. And driving around you will hear how the noise from overhead lines varies. Living in an area with underground utilities is the best scenario and I have been lucky enough to have that both in my old home and in the new one.

I do have one strange noise source in my new house I haven't figured out yet but luckily it is infrequent. On parts of the AM band I will hear a squeal which almost totally blanks out medium strength stations on 590 and 630 KHz but it only seems to happen once or perhaps twice a day for about 2 minutes. Some days I never hear it. Makes it tough to isolate...really odd though.


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

R茅my Friess
 

Hi everyone out there,

Powerlines, appliances etc... do indeed generate a lot of QRM and can be a nuisance, but sometimes powerlines can also be pretty useful for the hobby.

I live in the east of France and I drive around a lot in the area and I found out that on the motorway, right where a 220 000 volt power line crosses the way, the FM DX picture changes completely.

The power line runs SE-NW, roughly in a direction from Freiburg (south-west Germany) to Luxembourg.

Every time I drive near that line, the local station on 106.6 MHz gets wiped out by a station from Germany, an another local station on 93.3 MHz is also blown away by one in Luxembourg (300 kms away). In both cases the distant signal is very stable. The RDS data are even present on the display of the car radio.

It seems the powerline acts like a duct, and the signals propagate along it. Also, and this might explain the thing partly, it consists of 6 cables with a 3 metre interval (1位)聽 between them.

Unfortunately I can't park the car underneath the line to explore the whole FM band, but I'm pretty sure the are some more DX stations to be found that way.

When that corona lockdown nonsense is over I'll try and find a place in the countryside near the line and use my Tecsun PL-380 to see what I can get.

73, R茅my.



Re: TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

Paul Blundell
 

Glad you liked it, you gave me the idea for it.


On Mon., 7 Dec. 2020, 20:15 Jorge Garz贸n via groups.io, <iberiaDX=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
That's a very interesting comparison. Thank you very much.聽

73!

Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


En lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2020 04:26:03 CET, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> escribi贸:


Over the past few months I have been making good use of my TEAC PR130 and Digitech AR-1733. I have completed a shootout of them over the past couple of weeks and present the results below.

FEATURES:聽
Both these radios fit in to the ultralight radio category, the TEAC PR130 retails for $34.95 and the Digitech AR-1733 is $79.95.

Physically the PR130 is a much smaller pocket sized radios, this I find fits in to my pocket well and it often comes out and about with me. The AR-1733 is a larger radio and it better suited to bed side / serious DXing and listening. The lack of a full keypad on the PR130 is due to the much smaller size. The limited buttons it does have do work well and to my mind do work in a logical fashion. While the AR-1733 does have a full keypad for frequency entry, I find myself most using the side mounted tuning knob.

The PR130 only covers the AM and FM broadcast bands, the AR-1733 covers these, plus the long wave, shortwave and VHF Airband, the later of these is an interesting inclusion and makes for some interesting listening. I often leave mine on our ATC frequency overnight as it makes for some good background noise.

Both radios take two batteries, in the case of the PR130, these are AAA, the AR-1733 takes AA, these provide much longer run times. In both cases I have found the battery life on both radios to be very good. On the AR-1733, it does exhibit some strange behaviours when the batteries start to get low, I always keep a spare set close by. The AR-1733 is also a little sensitive to rechargeable batteries, once they get a bit of age and usage, they don鈥檛 work as well with this radio, the PR130 happily runs on two AAA rechargeables.聽

The AR-1733 has two bandwidth filters, the PR130 has none, and this at times can allow the AR-1733 to filter out interference better.

SITES:
A. At home, with unavoidable noise, under real world conditions.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Over an extended period of time I have tested this radio at home. The internal aerial has a good level of directional gain and this allows me to null out pest stations. During daylight hours, I can often log a large number of Tasmanian and Victorian stations. After dark, I can log most states of Australian. I have noticed that the AR-1733 is more sensitive to local noise sources, such as mobile phones. I often need to make sure I leave mine in the other room. I have also noticed that our washing machine causes issues, it took me a while to track down some of the random band noise to this.

PR130: The performance of this is normally 75%-80% of my AR-1733. The biggest issues are that as this has a much smaller internal aerial, it does not pull in signals as well. Where it does perform better is handling overload from local stations, whereas the AR-1733 struggles with stations on either side of my local HPON station, the PR130 will, with careful orientation pull in acceptable signals. The smaller size also allows it to be placed for the best possible signal levels. Of late I have been focusing on logging some South Australian stations and this has produced some good results. I also find it makes a good bed time radio and after dark it really comes to life.

AR-1733 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

3

4

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

2

3

4

2

2.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

4

1

2.5

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

4

3

3

3.5

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

2

2.5

PR130 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

3

4

4

4

3.75

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

0

2

3

2

1.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

4

4

5

4

4.25

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

1

2

3

2

2

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

2

3

2

2

2.25

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

4

3

3.5

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

2

3

2.5

B. Portable, in the field. More or less an ideal site QRM free to check receiver's features. For this test I have chosen Talbot Road Lookout.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Generally this performed better away from home and at a higher location. The biggest issue was due to the outdoor location, audio quality suffered due to wind and passing traffic noise.

PR130: The performance of this was on par with at home and it didn鈥檛 have as much of a performance boast as the AR-1733. I found that the alignment of this with the direction of my target station was critical, as it was slightly closer to my local HPON station, this appeared to desense聽the PR130 to some extent.

AR-1733 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

5

5

4

4

4.5

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

3

3

4

2


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Paul Blundell
 

Thanks Jorge.

Some areas do have underground power but most is above聽ground on poles, like in my photo.

On Mon., 7 Dec. 2020, 19:55 Jorge Garz贸n via groups.io, <iberiaDX=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
QRM is our main nightmare these days, no doubt!聽
But I am still shocked with electric lines in Australia, Canada, the States together with some EU countries. When I lived in Oz and later visited the USA and Canada, I found electric poles and air cables a real mess. Fortunately, here in Spain electric distribution lines have to be buried in urban areas and/or encapsulated to avoid crossing streets, parks and open areas. Of course there are still some to be arranged but the most of them are well organised.聽

Unfortunately, this is not an 'insurance' to avoid QRM as house appliances, street lights, house IF filters (none) or transformers are still there, so being a DXer or serious radiolistener involves a carefully place to live or enjoy radio and nature most of the times.聽

隆Buen DX!聽



Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


En domingo, 6 de diciembre de 2020 23:46:02 CET, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> escribi贸:


Over the weekend we had a small power outage (due to weather). During this time I noticed a real drop in the background noise on the band. Before I could do much testing, the power came back on.

Below is a photo of the power lines outside my house, would this be adding to my issues?



Re: TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

Paul Blundell
 

Thanks Bob. I have another radio on the way, I will add that to my next test session.


On Mon., 7 Dec. 2020, 18:58 Bob Connolly, <bob.chris@...> wrote:
Terrific review, Paul...comprehensive and clearly presented...

Sent from my iHead

On 7/12/2020, at 4:26 PM, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> wrote:

Over the past few months I have been making good use of my TEAC PR130 and Digitech AR-1733. I have completed a shootout of them over the past couple of weeks and present the results below.

FEATURES:聽
Both these radios fit in to the ultralight radio category, the TEAC PR130 retails for $34.95 and the Digitech AR-1733 is $79.95.

Physically the PR130 is a much smaller pocket sized radios, this I find fits in to my pocket well and it often comes out and about with me. The AR-1733 is a larger radio and it better suited to bed side / serious DXing and listening. The lack of a full keypad on the PR130 is due to the much smaller size. The limited buttons it does have do work well and to my mind do work in a logical fashion. While the AR-1733 does have a full keypad for frequency entry, I find myself most using the side mounted tuning knob.

The PR130 only covers the AM and FM broadcast bands, the AR-1733 covers these, plus the long wave, shortwave and VHF Airband, the later of these is an interesting inclusion and makes for some interesting listening. I often leave mine on our ATC frequency overnight as it makes for some good background noise.

Both radios take two batteries, in the case of the PR130, these are AAA, the AR-1733 takes AA, these provide much longer run times. In both cases I have found the battery life on both radios to be very good. On the AR-1733, it does exhibit some strange behaviours when the batteries start to get low, I always keep a spare set close by. The AR-1733 is also a little sensitive to rechargeable batteries, once they get a bit of age and usage, they don鈥檛 work as well with this radio, the PR130 happily runs on two AAA rechargeables.聽

The AR-1733 has two bandwidth filters, the PR130 has none, and this at times can allow the AR-1733 to filter out interference better.

SITES:
A. At home, with unavoidable noise, under real world conditions.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Over an extended period of time I have tested this radio at home. The internal aerial has a good level of directional gain and this allows me to null out pest stations. During daylight hours, I can often log a large number of Tasmanian and Victorian stations. After dark, I can log most states of Australian. I have noticed that the AR-1733 is more sensitive to local noise sources, such as mobile phones. I often need to make sure I leave mine in the other room. I have also noticed that our washing machine causes issues, it took me a while to track down some of the random band noise to this.

PR130: The performance of this is normally 75%-80% of my AR-1733. The biggest issues are that as this has a much smaller internal aerial, it does not pull in signals as well. Where it does perform better is handling overload from local stations, whereas the AR-1733 struggles with stations on either side of my local HPON station, the PR130 will, with careful orientation pull in acceptable signals. The smaller size also allows it to be placed for the best possible signal levels. Of late I have been focusing on logging some South Australian stations and this has produced some good results. I also find it makes a good bed time radio and after dark it really comes to life.

AR-1733 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

3

4

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

2

3

4

2

2.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

4

1

2.5

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

4

3

3

3.5

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

2

2.5

PR130 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

3

4

4

4

3.75

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

0

2

3

2

1.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

4

4

5

4

4.25

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

1

2

3

2

2

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

2

3

2

2

2.25

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

4

3

3.5

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

2

3

2.5

B. Portable, in the field. More or less an ideal site QRM free to check receiver's features. For this test I have chosen Talbot Road Lookout.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Generally this performed better away from home and at a higher location. The biggest issue was due to the outdoor location, audio quality suffered due to wind and passing traffic noise.

PR130: The performance of this was on par with at home and it didn鈥檛 have as much of a performance boast as the AR-1733. I found that the alignment of this with the direction of my target station was critical, as it was slightly closer to my local HPON station, this appeared to desense聽the PR130 to some extent.

AR-1733 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose


Sangean DT-250 review

Jorge Garz贸n
 

I have made my first review of an ULR receiver, the Sangean DT-250. Can be seen here:聽https://youtu.be/BABe620f-3M

It's in Spanish, and could also be used to get better Spanish language skills for DXers abroad. 馃槈

隆Buen DX!聽

Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

VK5PAS
 

Hi Paul,

In the middle of this year I moved house from the town of Mount Barker in the Adelaide Hills, to a rural property at Ashbourne south of Adelaide.

My noise floor at Mount Barker was S7 on the 40m band on my dipole antenna.

At Ashbourne I have zero man made noise.聽 I can hear a pin drop.

BUT, if the power outlet for our TV is switched on in the main living area, the noise jumps up to S5-6.聽 That is easily fixed.聽 If I'm on the radio, my wife (who is also an amateur) watches the other TV at the other end of the house, which generates no noise.

We also recently had an outdoor NBN extender installed, to allow internet to our shed.聽 When that was installed the noise floor went up to S7.聽 Needless to say that has now been removed, and I am back down to zero noise again.聽

Even our reverse cycle heating and cooling, when on, generates some noise on the bands.

Something as small as a power outlet or NBN in your own home, can cause sufficient noise to be very annoying.聽 Yet alone, everyone else's home surrounding you.

You might want to have a look at QRM.guru.聽 Here is the link.....

https://qrm.guru/

Good luck.

Regards,聽

Paul VK5PAS.


Re: TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

Jorge Garz贸n
 

That's a very interesting comparison. Thank you very much.聽

73!

Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


En lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2020 04:26:03 CET, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> escribi贸:


Over the past few months I have been making good use of my TEAC PR130 and Digitech AR-1733. I have completed a shootout of them over the past couple of weeks and present the results below.

FEATURES:聽
Both these radios fit in to the ultralight radio category, the TEAC PR130 retails for $34.95 and the Digitech AR-1733 is $79.95.

Physically the PR130 is a much smaller pocket sized radios, this I find fits in to my pocket well and it often comes out and about with me. The AR-1733 is a larger radio and it better suited to bed side / serious DXing and listening. The lack of a full keypad on the PR130 is due to the much smaller size. The limited buttons it does have do work well and to my mind do work in a logical fashion. While the AR-1733 does have a full keypad for frequency entry, I find myself most using the side mounted tuning knob.

The PR130 only covers the AM and FM broadcast bands, the AR-1733 covers these, plus the long wave, shortwave and VHF Airband, the later of these is an interesting inclusion and makes for some interesting listening. I often leave mine on our ATC frequency overnight as it makes for some good background noise.

Both radios take two batteries, in the case of the PR130, these are AAA, the AR-1733 takes AA, these provide much longer run times. In both cases I have found the battery life on both radios to be very good. On the AR-1733, it does exhibit some strange behaviours when the batteries start to get low, I always keep a spare set close by. The AR-1733 is also a little sensitive to rechargeable batteries, once they get a bit of age and usage, they don鈥檛 work as well with this radio, the PR130 happily runs on two AAA rechargeables.聽

The AR-1733 has two bandwidth filters, the PR130 has none, and this at times can allow the AR-1733 to filter out interference better.

SITES:
A. At home, with unavoidable noise, under real world conditions.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Over an extended period of time I have tested this radio at home. The internal aerial has a good level of directional gain and this allows me to null out pest stations. During daylight hours, I can often log a large number of Tasmanian and Victorian stations. After dark, I can log most states of Australian. I have noticed that the AR-1733 is more sensitive to local noise sources, such as mobile phones. I often need to make sure I leave mine in the other room. I have also noticed that our washing machine causes issues, it took me a while to track down some of the random band noise to this.

PR130: The performance of this is normally 75%-80% of my AR-1733. The biggest issues are that as this has a much smaller internal aerial, it does not pull in signals as well. Where it does perform better is handling overload from local stations, whereas the AR-1733 struggles with stations on either side of my local HPON station, the PR130 will, with careful orientation pull in acceptable signals. The smaller size also allows it to be placed for the best possible signal levels. Of late I have been focusing on logging some South Australian stations and this has produced some good results. I also find it makes a good bed time radio and after dark it really comes to life.

AR-1733 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

3

4

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

2

3

4

2

2.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

4

1

2.5

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

4

3

3

3.5

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

2

2.5

PR130 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

3

4

4

4

3.75

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

0

2

3

2

1.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

4

4

5

4

4.25

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

1

2

3

2

2

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

2

3

2

2

2.25

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

4

3

3.5

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

2

3

2.5

B. Portable, in the field. More or less an ideal site QRM free to check receiver's features. For this test I have chosen Talbot Road Lookout.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Generally this performed better away from home and at a higher location. The biggest issue was due to the outdoor location, audio quality suffered due to wind and passing traffic noise.

PR130: The performance of this was on par with at home and it didn鈥檛 have as much of a performance boast as the AR-1733. I found that the alignment of this with the direction of my target station was critical, as it was slightly closer to my local HPON station, this appeared to desense聽the PR130 to some extent.

AR-1733 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

5

5

4

4

4.5

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

3

3

4

2

3

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

4

4

3

3.25

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

4

4

4

3

3.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

5

4

3

4

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

5

3

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

PR130 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

4

4.25

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

1

2

3

2

2

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

3

3

2.75

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

3

2.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

5

4

3

3.75

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

4

4

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

3

3

2.75

Other Considerations:

FM: Band: Both of these radios were tested at home and at Talbot Road Lookout.

AR-1733: Picked up all major FM Stations I would expect. I also logged a couple of low power stations including LC FM. Overload on adjacent frequencies from a couple of the high power ABC stations was noticed.

PR130: This radio really shines on the FM band and performance was on par with the AR-1733, it did seem to have less issues with the ABC stations not causing as much overloading and audio was good.

Audio quality: Both radios produce audio with a nice tone and acceptable volume, the PR130 really shines with the use of ear phones and this is mostly how I use it.

Ease of use:聽The PR130 has less buttons, this makes usage in the dark much easier (less to remember) and the side mounted tuning buttons are easy to find and use as needed. The AR-1733 has a lot more buttons and as these are not backlit, it is easy to hit the wrong button by accident. For day time DXing, the full keypad makes moving between frequencies much easier.



Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Jorge Garz贸n
 

QRM is our main nightmare these days, no doubt!聽
But I am still shocked with electric lines in Australia, Canada, the States together with some EU countries. When I lived in Oz and later visited the USA and Canada, I found electric poles and air cables a real mess. Fortunately, here in Spain electric distribution lines have to be buried in urban areas and/or encapsulated to avoid crossing streets, parks and open areas. Of course there are still some to be arranged but the most of them are well organised.聽

Unfortunately, this is not an 'insurance' to avoid QRM as house appliances, street lights, house IF filters (none) or transformers are still there, so being a DXer or serious radiolistener involves a carefully place to live or enjoy radio and nature most of the times.聽

隆Buen DX!聽



Jorge Garz贸n (EB7EFA 路 EA1036 SWL)聽
QTH: IN83ag / 43潞15' N 路 03潞56' W
Urb. San Roque 95, casa 5 (Villasevil)
39698 Santiurde de Toranzo (ESPA脩A - SPAIN)
..................................................................................
Blog: IberiaDX聽聽路聽Twitter: @IberiaDX


En domingo, 6 de diciembre de 2020 23:46:02 CET, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> escribi贸:


Over the weekend we had a small power outage (due to weather). During this time I noticed a real drop in the background noise on the band. Before I could do much testing, the power came back on.

Below is a photo of the power lines outside my house, would this be adding to my issues?



Re: TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

Bob Connolly
 

Terrific review, Paul...comprehensive and clearly presented...

Sent from my iHead

On 7/12/2020, at 4:26 PM, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> wrote:

Over the past few months I have been making good use of my TEAC PR130 and Digitech AR-1733. I have completed a shootout of them over the past couple of weeks and present the results below.

FEATURES:聽
Both these radios fit in to the ultralight radio category, the TEAC PR130 retails for $34.95 and the Digitech AR-1733 is $79.95.

Physically the PR130 is a much smaller pocket sized radios, this I find fits in to my pocket well and it often comes out and about with me. The AR-1733 is a larger radio and it better suited to bed side / serious DXing and listening. The lack of a full keypad on the PR130 is due to the much smaller size. The limited buttons it does have do work well and to my mind do work in a logical fashion. While the AR-1733 does have a full keypad for frequency entry, I find myself most using the side mounted tuning knob.

The PR130 only covers the AM and FM broadcast bands, the AR-1733 covers these, plus the long wave, shortwave and VHF Airband, the later of these is an interesting inclusion and makes for some interesting listening. I often leave mine on our ATC frequency overnight as it makes for some good background noise.

Both radios take two batteries, in the case of the PR130, these are AAA, the AR-1733 takes AA, these provide much longer run times. In both cases I have found the battery life on both radios to be very good. On the AR-1733, it does exhibit some strange behaviours when the batteries start to get low, I always keep a spare set close by. The AR-1733 is also a little sensitive to rechargeable batteries, once they get a bit of age and usage, they don鈥檛 work as well with this radio, the PR130 happily runs on two AAA rechargeables.聽

The AR-1733 has two bandwidth filters, the PR130 has none, and this at times can allow the AR-1733 to filter out interference better.

SITES:
A. At home, with unavoidable noise, under real world conditions.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Over an extended period of time I have tested this radio at home. The internal aerial has a good level of directional gain and this allows me to null out pest stations. During daylight hours, I can often log a large number of Tasmanian and Victorian stations. After dark, I can log most states of Australian. I have noticed that the AR-1733 is more sensitive to local noise sources, such as mobile phones. I often need to make sure I leave mine in the other room. I have also noticed that our washing machine causes issues, it took me a while to track down some of the random band noise to this.

PR130: The performance of this is normally 75%-80% of my AR-1733. The biggest issues are that as this has a much smaller internal aerial, it does not pull in signals as well. Where it does perform better is handling overload from local stations, whereas the AR-1733 struggles with stations on either side of my local HPON station, the PR130 will, with careful orientation pull in acceptable signals. The smaller size also allows it to be placed for the best possible signal levels. Of late I have been focusing on logging some South Australian stations and this has produced some good results. I also find it makes a good bed time radio and after dark it really comes to life.

AR-1733 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

3

4

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

2

3

4

2

2.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

4

1

2.5

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

4

3

3

3.5

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

2

2.5

PR130 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

3

4

4

4

3.75

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

0

2

3

2

1.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

4

4

5

4

4.25

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

1

2

3

2

2

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

2

3

2

2

2.25

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

4

3

3.5

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

2

3

2.5

B. Portable, in the field. More or less an ideal site QRM free to check receiver's features. For this test I have chosen Talbot Road Lookout.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Generally this performed better away from home and at a higher location. The biggest issue was due to the outdoor location, audio quality suffered due to wind and passing traffic noise.

PR130: The performance of this was on par with at home and it didn鈥檛 have as much of a performance boast as the AR-1733. I found that the alignment of this with the direction of my target station was critical, as it was slightly closer to my local HPON station, this appeared to desense聽the PR130 to some extent.

AR-1733 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

5

5

4

4

4.5

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

3

3

4

2

3

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

4

4

3

3.25

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

4

4

4

3

3.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

5

4

3

4

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

5

3

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

PR130 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

4

4.25

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

1

2

3

2

2

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

3

3

2.75

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

3

2.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

5

4

3

3.75

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

4

4

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

3

3

2.75

Other Considerations:

FM: Band: Both of these radios were tested at home and at Talbot Road Lookout.

AR-1733: Picked up all major FM Stations I would expect. I also logged a couple of low power stations including LC FM. Overload on adjacent frequencies from a couple of the high power ABC stations was noticed.

PR130: This radio really shines on the FM band and performance was on par with the AR-1733, it did seem to have less issues with the ABC stations not causing as much overloading and audio was good.

Audio quality: Both radios produce audio with a nice tone and acceptable volume, the PR130 really shines with the use of ear phones and this is mostly how I use it.

Ease of use:聽The PR130 has less buttons, this makes usage in the dark much easier (less to remember) and the side mounted tuning buttons are easy to find and use as needed. The AR-1733 has a lot more buttons and as these are not backlit, it is easy to hit the wrong button by accident. For day time DXing, the full keypad makes moving between frequencies much easier.



TEAC PR130 V Digitech AR-1733 - Head to Head Testing - December 2020

Paul Blundell
 

Over the past few months I have been making good use of my TEAC PR130 and Digitech AR-1733. I have completed a shootout of them over the past couple of weeks and present the results below.

FEATURES:聽
Both these radios fit in to the ultralight radio category, the TEAC PR130 retails for $34.95 and the Digitech AR-1733 is $79.95.

Physically the PR130 is a much smaller pocket sized radios, this I find fits in to my pocket well and it often comes out and about with me. The AR-1733 is a larger radio and it better suited to bed side / serious DXing and listening. The lack of a full keypad on the PR130 is due to the much smaller size. The limited buttons it does have do work well and to my mind do work in a logical fashion. While the AR-1733 does have a full keypad for frequency entry, I find myself most using the side mounted tuning knob.

The PR130 only covers the AM and FM broadcast bands, the AR-1733 covers these, plus the long wave, shortwave and VHF Airband, the later of these is an interesting inclusion and makes for some interesting listening. I often leave mine on our ATC frequency overnight as it makes for some good background noise.

Both radios take two batteries, in the case of the PR130, these are AAA, the AR-1733 takes AA, these provide much longer run times. In both cases I have found the battery life on both radios to be very good. On the AR-1733, it does exhibit some strange behaviours when the batteries start to get low, I always keep a spare set close by. The AR-1733 is also a little sensitive to rechargeable batteries, once they get a bit of age and usage, they don鈥檛 work as well with this radio, the PR130 happily runs on two AAA rechargeables.聽

The AR-1733 has two bandwidth filters, the PR130 has none, and this at times can allow the AR-1733 to filter out interference better.

SITES:
A. At home, with unavoidable noise, under real world conditions.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Over an extended period of time I have tested this radio at home. The internal aerial has a good level of directional gain and this allows me to null out pest stations. During daylight hours, I can often log a large number of Tasmanian and Victorian stations. After dark, I can log most states of Australian. I have noticed that the AR-1733 is more sensitive to local noise sources, such as mobile phones. I often need to make sure I leave mine in the other room. I have also noticed that our washing machine causes issues, it took me a while to track down some of the random band noise to this.

PR130: The performance of this is normally 75%-80% of my AR-1733. The biggest issues are that as this has a much smaller internal aerial, it does not pull in signals as well. Where it does perform better is handling overload from local stations, whereas the AR-1733 struggles with stations on either side of my local HPON station, the PR130 will, with careful orientation pull in acceptable signals. The smaller size also allows it to be placed for the best possible signal levels. Of late I have been focusing on logging some South Australian stations and this has produced some good results. I also find it makes a good bed time radio and after dark it really comes to life.

AR-1733 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

3

4

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

2

3

4

2

2.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

4

1

2.5

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

4

3

3

3.5

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

3

2

3

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

2

2.5

PR130 / Home

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

3

4

4

4

3.75

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

0

2

3

2

1.75

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

4

4

5

4

4.25

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

1

2

3

2

2

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

2

3

2

2

2.25

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

3

4

4

3

3.5

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

2

3

2.5

B. Portable, in the field. More or less an ideal site QRM free to check receiver's features. For this test I have chosen Talbot Road Lookout.

Barefoot:

AR-1733: Generally this performed better away from home and at a higher location. The biggest issue was due to the outdoor location, audio quality suffered due to wind and passing traffic noise.

PR130: The performance of this was on par with at home and it didn鈥檛 have as much of a performance boast as the AR-1733. I found that the alignment of this with the direction of my target station was critical, as it was slightly closer to my local HPON station, this appeared to desense聽the PR130 to some extent.

AR-1733 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

5

5

4

4

4.5

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

3

3

4

2

3

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

4

4.75

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

4

4

3

3.25

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

4

4

4

3

3.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

4

5

4

3

4

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

5

3

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

4

3

3

3.25

PR130 / Talbot Road Lookout

FREQ

Callsign

Area Served

Purpose

Power

531

3GG

Warragul

Commercial

5k

4

5

4

4

4.25

549

2CR

Cumnock

National

50k

1

2

3

2

2

594

3WV

Horsham

National

50k

4

5

5

4

4.5

621

3RN

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

5

5

5

774

3LO

Melbourne

National

50k

5

5

4

5

4.75

1053

2CA

Canberra

Commercial

5k

2

3

3

3

2.75

1179

3RPH

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

3

2

3

2.75

1341

HPON GEELONG

Geelong

HPON

5k

3

5

4

3

3.75

1422

HPON MELBOURNE

Melbourne

HPON

5k

4

4

4

4

4

1503

3KND

Melbourne

Community

5k

3

2

3

3

2.75

Other Considerations:

FM: Band: Both of these radios were tested at home and at Talbot Road Lookout.

AR-1733: Picked up all major FM Stations I would expect. I also logged a couple of low power stations including LC FM. Overload on adjacent frequencies from a couple of the high power ABC stations was noticed.

PR130: This radio really shines on the FM band and performance was on par with the AR-1733, it did seem to have less issues with the ABC stations not causing as much overloading and audio was good.

Audio quality: Both radios produce audio with a nice tone and acceptable volume, the PR130 really shines with the use of ear phones and this is mostly how I use it.

Ease of use:聽The PR130 has less buttons, this makes usage in the dark much easier (less to remember) and the side mounted tuning buttons are easy to find and use as needed. The AR-1733 has a lot more buttons and as these are not backlit, it is easy to hit the wrong button by accident. For day time DXing, the full keypad makes moving between frequencies much easier.



Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Paul Blundell
 

Thanks Kevin.

Thankfully we have FTTP NBN in this area so we don't need to worry about ADSL and the MTM NBN issues (like others do). I have checked via Google Street View and I have three pole mounted transformers聽within 150m, I am sort of right in the middle of these.

Paul



On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:02 AM kevin asato via groups.io <kc6pob=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

It certainly does.
I have a similar situation in which the utility pole which has power and POTS/xDSL runs in back of my house and does similar. The good thing is that the transformer on the pole was replaced a couple of years ago which took care of some of the noise and arcing due to local salt fog (beach weather!). Still does not clear it all up as my power drop runs diagonal across the yard to the back and middle of the house.
73,
kevin
kc6pob

On Sunday, December 6, 2020, 02:46:03 PM PST, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> wrote:


Over the weekend we had a small power outage (due to weather). During this time I noticed a real drop in the background noise on the band. Before I could do much testing, the power came back on.

Below is a photo of the power lines outside my house, would this be adding to my issues?




--
Paul


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

Paul Blundell
 

Thanks for the reply. I might go for a walk over the weekend and see what I can find and hear on the band. The last month or so has had really bad weather most weekends so I have been stuck at home more than I would like.

Paul

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 10:30 AM Phillips <phillicom@...> wrote:
Hi Paul,

If you need a bit of exercise, tune a radio to a dead frequency and go for a walk around your neighbourhood.

You will find dirty/faulty insulators, poor junctions, plasma TV sets and others; all contributing to QRM.

If you take the radio on a tour inside your house, you might surprise yourself with how much QRM some of your household appliances generate.

At my location in Adelaide, QRM is never below S7 and frequently above S9 unless there is a power outage.聽 When the power fails, I can pull in just about all SA and many Victorian and Tassie stations in the day time but, when the power is on, I simply give up on any DX.聽 We've just had 3 days of horrendous winds and not even a single flicker on the mains, very disappointing.


From: main@UltralightDX.groups.io <main@UltralightDX.groups.io> on behalf of Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...>
Sent: Monday, 7 December 2020 9:15 AM
To: main@UltralightDX.groups.io <main@UltralightDX.groups.io>
Subject: [UltralightDX] Local Power Lines and DXing
Over the weekend we had a small power outage (due to weather). During this time I noticed a real drop in the background noise on the band. Before I could do much testing, the power came back on.

Below is a photo of the power lines outside my house, would this be adding to my issues?




--
Paul


Re: Local Power Lines and DXing

kevin asato <kc6pob@...>
 


It certainly does.
I have a similar situation in which the utility pole which has power and POTS/xDSL runs in back of my house and does similar. The good thing is that the transformer on the pole was replaced a couple of years ago which took care of some of the noise and arcing due to local salt fog (beach weather!). Still does not clear it all up as my power drop runs diagonal across the yard to the back and middle of the house.
73,
kevin
kc6pob

On Sunday, December 6, 2020, 02:46:03 PM PST, Paul Blundell <tanger32au@...> wrote:


Over the weekend we had a small power outage (due to weather). During this time I noticed a real drop in the background noise on the band. Before I could do much testing, the power came back on.

Below is a photo of the power lines outside my house, would this be adding to my issues?


2421 - 2440 of 32521