I guess the flip side of this is that we could limit the aerial size / type but allow any type of radio. To me, the challenge is in pushing the radio to its limits, sometimes this is just the radio,

I have now had a chance to fully read this, the level of detail you have gone to and the expert knowledge of these radios is clear from your review. Paul -- Paul

We all know which ultralight radio I prefer :)

Gary, I enjoyed your extensive radio comparisons, and thank you for such a thorough and clear "shoot-out". I have the radios you featured, and although I know 'mileage may differ' from one example to

Hi Gary, Thank you for your thorough and very informative 2021 Ultralight Shootout and review article! You obviously put forth a significant effort compiling this review. I enjoyed reading every bit

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 06:38 AM, radiojayallen wrote: Gary, Great article...I enjoyed every minute of it! JayJay and All, Thank you all very much for your positive comments on the 2021 Shootout! Jay,

Oh Gary, Wish I hadn't viewed this . . . Piggy bank is near empty, so mope I must. Whoa - eureka - I could resurrect my ultralight galena

Gary, Great article...I enjoyed every minute of it! Jay

Thanks Gary, I've been looking forward to this :) Peter

Gord, > Things like the AR-1780 are not included because they are a few cubic sentimeters too large, but five or ten pounds of ferrite rods, and multi hundred strand wire, > that far exceed the size

hi Jock, You were where I live. Harold Cheetham On Sunday, May 2, 2021, 07:03:24 AM EDT, Jock Elliott <jock.elliott@...> wrote:

I did read to the end and thought it was interesting about the difference between the numbering of the channels.

Well said. Maybe we need to have multiple classes for the various sizes?

With regard to the NOAA weather radio reception of the CCrane Skywave SSB, here's some info that I posted Radio Reference that might prove useful for anyone for whom NOAA weather radio is a high

Gary, Wow, this is terrific stuff . . . thorough, useful, and deftly written. Well done! Put a Gold Star on your chart. Cheers, Jock

Hi Gord, Well, I am not proposing changes in the ULR scene. I am just a keen dxer that I do this to enjoy the radio (Paul Blundell statement is right) ;-) But the reality of the DXing panorama in

I have just had a quick look, this is amazing and you have clearly put a huge amount of time and effort into it. Paul

Gord. Nobody is saying that you can't use any radio you want in anyway you want. I have owned an AR1780 and also found it to be a very good radio. For the group awards and challenges we have the

Jorge, those receiver classifications make a lot more sense to me than the overly restrictive ones used here. Things like the AR-1780 are not included because they are a few cubic sentimeters too

The 39-page 2021 Ultralight Radio Shootout review is available for download! Fully detailed reviews of the XHDATA D-808, Radiwow R-108, C. Crane Skywave (Basic and SSB), Tecsun PL-330 and the Tecsun