|
New file uploaded to ultralightdx
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ultralightdx
group.
File : /Members Sound Files/PL380 6 4 3 2 kHz
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ultralightdx
group.
File : /Members Sound Files/PL380 6 4 3 2 kHz
|
By
ultralightdx@...
·
#7709
·
|
|
Re: Si4734 Hardware and Software Guides
howdy Roy!
thank you. i need to add that info. my original plan was RS232 control. i recently saw your USB/G8 work... excellent job!
regards,
phil :)
howdy Roy!
thank you. i need to add that info. my original plan was RS232 control. i recently saw your USB/G8 work... excellent job!
regards,
phil :)
|
By
just_rtfm
·
#7708
·
|
|
Re: Eton E5
The E5 is also much too large to be an ultralight.
The E5 is also much too large to be an ultralight.
|
By
Gary Kinsman
·
#7707
·
|
|
Re: Eton E5
--- In ultralightdx@..., "jerrysteck" >
> i think the answer to my upcoming query is a negative--
> having said that i will now ask:
>
> would an Eton E5 be considered an ULR?--it is small, but it
--- In ultralightdx@..., "jerrysteck" >
> i think the answer to my upcoming query is a negative--
> having said that i will now ask:
>
> would an Eton E5 be considered an ULR?--it is small, but it
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#7706
·
|
|
Eton E5
i think the answer to my upcoming query is a negative--
having said that i will now ask:
would an Eton E5 be considered an ULR?--it is small, but it would seem to have more gizmos than a typical
i think the answer to my upcoming query is a negative--
having said that i will now ask:
would an Eton E5 be considered an ULR?--it is small, but it would seem to have more gizmos than a typical
|
By
jerrysteck
·
#7705
·
|
|
Re: Si4734 Hardware and Software Guides
Hi Phil
Your Ver 2 is very informative.
You might like to point out that the AM: LO frequency is 45 kHz above RF for RF frequencies < 1000 kHz and 45 kHz below RF for RF frequencies > 1000 kHz.
Hi Phil
Your Ver 2 is very informative.
You might like to point out that the AM: LO frequency is 45 kHz above RF for RF frequencies < 1000 kHz and 45 kHz below RF for RF frequencies > 1000 kHz.
|
By
Roy <roy.dyball@...>
·
#7704
·
|
|
Si4734 Hardware and Software Guides
Hacking the Si4734:
Hardware (Ver 2) and Software Handbooks for Shortwave
available at link below. error reports welcome.
http://home.comcast.net/~phils_radio_designs/index2.htm
regards,
phil :)
Hacking the Si4734:
Hardware (Ver 2) and Software Handbooks for Shortwave
available at link below. error reports welcome.
http://home.comcast.net/~phils_radio_designs/index2.htm
regards,
phil :)
|
By
just_rtfm
·
#7703
·
|
|
Re: What about Kchibo DSP KK-S500 MW FM SW
Note the trucated MW coverage:
Specifications :
1. Frequency Range
FM: 76-108 Mhz
MW: Asia, Africa and Europe, 522-1620Khz 9KHz step
United States, Canada, 520-1620KHz 10KHz
Note the trucated MW coverage:
Specifications :
1. Frequency Range
FM: 76-108 Mhz
MW: Asia, Africa and Europe, 522-1620Khz 9KHz step
United States, Canada, 520-1620KHz 10KHz
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#7702
·
|
|
Re: What about Kchibo DSP KK-S500 MW FM SW
Hi gc:
The Kchibo KK-S500 appears to be a dual conversion "regular" radio, not a DSP radio. It has synchronous detection, akin to SSB, and is fairly large, so it would therefore not qualify as an
Hi gc:
The Kchibo KK-S500 appears to be a dual conversion "regular" radio, not a DSP radio. It has synchronous detection, akin to SSB, and is fairly large, so it would therefore not qualify as an
|
By
dhsatyadhana <satya@...>
·
#7701
·
|
|
Re: Montreal AM shutdowns
I am not surprised that the call letters were not mentioned. The vastmajority of people would not have a clue what station were were talkingabout if you referred to them only by call letters since
I am not surprised that the call letters were not mentioned. The vastmajority of people would not have a clue what station were were talkingabout if you referred to them only by call letters since
|
By
Jim <va3jno@...>
·
#7700
·
|
|
Traverse City, MI Loggings, All Times UTC
1.31.10, 0955, am 540, CBEF, Windsor, ON, 216mi/348km, CCRadio-SWP (ID This is CBC Radio 1)
1.31.10, 1010, am 1120, KMOX, St. Louis, MO, 486mi/781km, CCRadio-SWP (Playing Old Time Radio program)
--
1.31.10, 0955, am 540, CBEF, Windsor, ON, 216mi/348km, CCRadio-SWP (ID This is CBC Radio 1)
1.31.10, 1010, am 1120, KMOX, St. Louis, MO, 486mi/781km, CCRadio-SWP (Playing Old Time Radio program)
--
|
By
Antonios Kekalos <akekalos@...>
·
#7699
·
|
|
What about Kchibo DSP KK-S500 MW FM SW
Hello,
Would it contain teh silabs dsp chip too??
gc
Hello,
Would it contain teh silabs dsp chip too??
gc
|
By
gratiscomputer <gratiscomputer@...>
·
#7698
·
|
|
Re: Measuring PL-380 Soft-Mute
Further info: Via my USB-equipped PL-300wt, I can read out that
its soft-mute is configured with a threshold at SNR = 6 dB and
the soft-mute slope is 2 dB/dB. This means that for each dB
that the
Further info: Via my USB-equipped PL-300wt, I can read out that
its soft-mute is configured with a threshold at SNR = 6 dB and
the soft-mute slope is 2 dB/dB. This means that for each dB
that the
|
By
sdwillingham
·
#7697
·
|
|
Re: Kchibo KK-D6110 - anyone have one?
I agree Jim - this is probably a fairly pedestrian model, otherwise they would have trumpeted the filter choices as with the D96L.
Kevin
I agree Jim - this is probably a fairly pedestrian model, otherwise they would have trumpeted the filter choices as with the D96L.
Kevin
|
By
dhsatyadhana <satya@...>
·
#7696
·
|
|
New UL Logs
Two new stations to add to the UL lately, heard on the PL-310 barefoot:
January 28
1060 WILB Canton OH, 1700, “This is AM 1060, WLIB…Catholic Radio for
northeast Ohio”, into a world newscast,
Two new stations to add to the UL lately, heard on the PL-310 barefoot:
January 28
1060 WILB Canton OH, 1700, “This is AM 1060, WLIB…Catholic Radio for
northeast Ohio”, into a world newscast,
|
By
John Cereghin <jcereghin@...>
·
#7695
·
|
|
Re: New member and new G8 owner
Hi Dave,
It has been said before, but probably bears repeating, that with the newer Chinese radios, you can't judge the performance of a certain make and model by a particular unit. They are fully
Hi Dave,
It has been said before, but probably bears repeating, that with the newer Chinese radios, you can't judge the performance of a certain make and model by a particular unit. They are fully
|
By
keith beesley
·
#7694
·
|
|
New member and new G8 owner
Hello!
Just saying "hi" to the group, as a new member. Also, I wanted to say that I purchased a Grundig G8 last night and am very happy I did. A neat little set; my first radio with DSP. The
Hello!
Just saying "hi" to the group, as a new member. Also, I wanted to say that I purchased a Grundig G8 last night and am very happy I did. A neat little set; my first radio with DSP. The
|
By
D <blvd_4762@...>
·
#7693
·
|
|
Re: Measuring PL-380 Soft-Mute
Thanks Scott!
That verifies what I've observed from Day 1. I purchased the PL-380
specifically because it was reported soft mute had been disabled.
Audicity is proving itself to be useful software
Thanks Scott!
That verifies what I've observed from Day 1. I purchased the PL-380
specifically because it was reported soft mute had been disabled.
Audicity is proving itself to be useful software
|
By
Chris Knight <chris@...>
·
#7692
·
|
|
Re: Measuring PL-380 Soft-Mute
For comparison, my stock PL-300wt measures about 12 dB soft-mute.
-Scott-
For comparison, my stock PL-300wt measures about 12 dB soft-mute.
-Scott-
|
By
sdwillingham
·
#7690
·
|
|
Measuring PL-380 Soft-Mute
Hi All,
It has been debated occasionally whether the PL-380 has
soft-mute. The short answer is: mine does (PL-380 2009.9 ver 1)
and it's fairly easy to measure. The procedure is to tune a
strong,
Hi All,
It has been debated occasionally whether the PL-380 has
soft-mute. The short answer is: mine does (PL-380 2009.9 ver 1)
and it's fairly easy to measure. The procedure is to tune a
strong,
|
By
sdwillingham
·
#7689
·
|