|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
I tried an E1...it's sensitivity off of the whip was similar to the G5. I was hoping for a miracle off of the whip (which I'm sure isn't possible to engineer, but hope springs eternal...) Of course,
I tried an E1...it's sensitivity off of the whip was similar to the G5. I was hoping for a miracle off of the whip (which I'm sure isn't possible to engineer, but hope springs eternal...) Of course,
|
By
lrdheat
·
#8111
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
Hi Powell,
Actually the Sony 2010 has SSB sync (USB or LSB), but not DSB sync. I've owned one for about 24 years.
I owned several E1XM units, but never got one that worked totally right.
The best
Hi Powell,
Actually the Sony 2010 has SSB sync (USB or LSB), but not DSB sync. I've owned one for about 24 years.
I owned several E1XM units, but never got one that worked totally right.
The best
|
By
Gary Kinsman
·
#8110
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Powell" wrote:
>
> You would think with all the DSP power that can be written into the chips they would have done a better job.
I guess they don't think the market is
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Powell" wrote:
>
> You would think with all the DSP power that can be written into the chips they would have done a better job.
I guess they don't think the market is
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8109
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
The Sony ICF-2010 has DSB sync, but I hear the E-1's is superior. I often get very strong selective fades on WLAC, and with the G3 it gets rather upset on these deep fades. It doesn't bother the 2010
The Sony ICF-2010 has DSB sync, but I hear the E-1's is superior. I often get very strong selective fades on WLAC, and with the G3 it gets rather upset on these deep fades. It doesn't bother the 2010
|
By
Powell
·
#8108
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
Hi Richard,
I believe the post on ABDX regarding the IBOC digital sideband layout, and the resulting interference, is correct.
One other thing to keep in mind is that KNX itself is an IBOC station.
Hi Richard,
I believe the post on ABDX regarding the IBOC digital sideband layout, and the resulting interference, is correct.
One other thing to keep in mind is that KNX itself is an IBOC station.
|
By
Gary Kinsman
·
#8107
·
|
|
Re: SSB decoding in SDRs and as procedure (algorithm) in the digital software
--- In ultralightdx@..., Richard Berler
> The G3, by contrast, is sensitive below around 1100 KHz, and much less by the time frequencies above 1400 KHz are tuned in. The situation improves when
--- In ultralightdx@..., Richard Berler
> The G3, by contrast, is sensitive below around 1100 KHz, and much less by the time frequencies above 1400 KHz are tuned in. The situation improves when
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8106
·
|
|
Re: SSB decoding in SDRs and as procedure (algorithm) in the digital software
Jim...
The G3, like the 7600 GR, has a clarifier wheel for the BFO...continuous adjustment as opposed to incremental. It does remain stable. ECSS tuning works, and is a good backup when lower
Jim...
The G3, like the 7600 GR, has a clarifier wheel for the BFO...continuous adjustment as opposed to incremental. It does remain stable. ECSS tuning works, and is a good backup when lower
|
By
lrdheat
·
#8105
·
|
|
Re: Traverse City, MI Loggings, All Times Eastern
Byron,
Thanks for the kind words. Don't have any of the ones you listed. Will probably be some time before I do as I keep hearing the same ones over and over.
Haven't even thought about trying to
Byron,
Thanks for the kind words. Don't have any of the ones you listed. Will probably be some time before I do as I keep hearing the same ones over and over.
Haven't even thought about trying to
|
By
Antonios Kekalos <akekalos@...>
·
#8104
·
|
|
Re: SSB decoding in SDRs and as procedure (algorithm) in the digital software
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Wolfgang H" >
> Hallo Jim,
>
> as far as I understood the technique of decoding SSB, there is a relationship to AM-decoding.
>
> In AM, the software-author takes two signal
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Wolfgang H" >
> Hallo Jim,
>
> as far as I understood the technique of decoding SSB, there is a relationship to AM-decoding.
>
> In AM, the software-author takes two signal
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8103
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
--- In ultralightdx@..., Richard Berler wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jim.
>
> Is an allignment of the BFO a big job?
Richard,
I saw the reply on ABDX, and that could explain what's happening. I don't know
--- In ultralightdx@..., Richard Berler wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jim.
>
> Is an allignment of the BFO a big job?
Richard,
I saw the reply on ABDX, and that could explain what's happening. I don't know
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8102
·
|
|
SSB decoding in SDRs and as procedure (algorithm) in the digital software
Hallo Jim,
as far as I understood the technique of decoding SSB, there is a relationship to AM-decoding.
In AM, the software-author takes two signal parts of the total AM-signal after decoding and
Hallo Jim,
as far as I understood the technique of decoding SSB, there is a relationship to AM-decoding.
In AM, the software-author takes two signal parts of the total AM-signal after decoding and
|
By
Wolfgang Hartmann
·
#8101
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
Thanks, Jim.
Is an allignment of the BFO a big job?
Heatwave
Thanks, Jim.
Is an allignment of the BFO a big job?
Heatwave
|
By
lrdheat
·
#8100
·
|
|
Re: Traverse City, MI Loggings, All Times Eastern
Hi Tony,
Congrats on 20 States Heard. wonder if have any i don't have yet ?
how about ME, NH, VT, DE, AL, SD ?????
Have you built your indoor loop antenna yet ? it will be necessary to get the hard
Hi Tony,
Congrats on 20 States Heard. wonder if have any i don't have yet ?
how about ME, NH, VT, DE, AL, SD ?????
Have you built your indoor loop antenna yet ? it will be necessary to get the hard
|
By
wa8lcz
·
#8099
·
|
|
Re: IBOC and ssb or sync detection
Synchronous and SSB-ECSS detection depend on a locally generated signal at the intermediate frequency (IF). To allow the use of a single bandpass filter at the IF, that locally generated signal
Synchronous and SSB-ECSS detection depend on a locally generated signal at the intermediate frequency (IF). To allow the use of a single bandpass filter at the IF, that locally generated signal
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8098
·
|
|
Re: 300
Congrats Jim! It was a fun contest. I'm still in the 280's (282) with the
logging tonight of XENZ-890. I've only got about 52 Colorado stations and
around 27 Mexican stations. Mexico is the easiest
Congrats Jim! It was a fun contest. I'm still in the 280's (282) with the
logging tonight of XENZ-890. I've only got about 52 Colorado stations and
around 27 Mexican stations. Mexico is the easiest
|
By
Chris Knight <chris@...>
·
#8094
·
|
|
IBOC and ssb or sync detection
I had a question concerning IBOC and sync: A strong signal (at least at my QTH in Laredo, TX) from an IBOC station (KRLD Dallas 1080 KHz) creates quite a bit of hash on 1070 and 1090. When using my
I had a question concerning IBOC and sync: A strong signal (at least at my QTH in Laredo, TX) from an IBOC station (KRLD Dallas 1080 KHz) creates quite a bit of hash on 1070 and 1090. When using my
|
By
lrdheat
·
#8095
·
|
|
Congratulations to Jim Kearman-- 300 Stations Heard Award
Hello All,
The Ultralight Awards Committee (Rob Ross and me) wish to express ourcongratulations to Jim Kearman, who has accomplished thereception of 300 stations using Ultralight radios in the
Hello All,
The Ultralight Awards Committee (Rob Ross and me) wish to express ourcongratulations to Jim Kearman, who has accomplished thereception of 300 stations using Ultralight radios in the
|
By
Gary DeBock
·
#8096
·
|
|
Congratulations to Tony Kekalos-- 20 States Heard Award
Hello All,
The Ultralight Awards Committee (Rob Ross and me) wish to honor TonyKekalos of Traverse City, Michigan, who has accomplished not only the receptionof 20 U.S. States on barefoot Ultralight
Hello All,
The Ultralight Awards Committee (Rob Ross and me) wish to honor TonyKekalos of Traverse City, Michigan, who has accomplished not only the receptionof 20 U.S. States on barefoot Ultralight
|
By
Gary DeBock
·
#8097
·
|
|
Re: 300
Well it's been quite a while since I bought a WRTVH. After ex number of years, old editions are more of a hindrance than a help. But 191 stations, I thought with Radio Reloj was pretty much it, in
Well it's been quite a while since I bought a WRTVH. After ex number of years, old editions are more of a hindrance than a help. But 191 stations, I thought with Radio Reloj was pretty much it, in
|
By
Alex
·
#8093
·
|
|
Re: 300
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Drew" wrote:
> Well considering it took me a year to do 100, that's quite a accomplishment in a month!
You did 100 on an analog radio. I don't have the fortitude to try
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Drew" wrote:
> Well considering it took me a year to do 100, that's quite a accomplishment in a month!
You did 100 on an analog radio. I don't have the fortitude to try
|
By
jim_kr1s <jkearman@...>
·
#8092
·
|