Of the recommended list, only the e100 has 1 khz tuning. The CCrane SWP has 1 khz tuning: it was initially a Turkey, but Gary DeBock recently reported that later production models seem to be

So-called "straight line" distance is appropriate. Try the following sites as well: www.indo.com/distance/ http://www.geobytes.com/CityDistanceTool.htm?loadpage Russ Edmunds Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL

Kevin Great explanation. Any other than E100 recommended recievers ULR, starting with lowest price first and then up that have 1khz increments ? TX rob the increments however,

Hi Kevin, So far, I have purchased four E100's from"oceansno.1" on eBay, at the average cost of $18.00 (plus about $18 shipping perunit, by UPS). Every E100 was in excellent condition,

Hey Rob: The M37V and DT400W tune in fixed 9 or 10 khz increments (you select either one depending on where you're at in the world). As you push the tune button, the receiver tuning jumps up and

Kevin: As I posted before I just missed out on Durham radio E100 sale a few weeks ago by minutes or hours. But to show my newness what does ".....unable to tune in 1 khz increments ..." mean? What

Steve: Thanks for the report- so far sounds very good- rob

Hey Rob: The DT400W is the sensitivity champ, although it is unable to tune in 1 khz increments and the stock selectivity is rather broad, especially for TA work. There is a filter mod posted at

What is the generally accepted way to calculate distance ( I assume straight line/air/flying distance), or put another way, what web calculator do most users utilize? For instance last night 1:00 a.m

Only having the SRF-59 for 1 month as my first ULR, looking for a digital readout ULR. Apperars from summer shootout that the Sangean DT400W is best bet. However, can anyone comment on actually using

Dave, I can only hope that here on the east U.S. coast , Buffalo, NY, that I EVER log a TA station. I bookmarked the link- and will keep my fingers crosssed. TY, rob wrote: three

Rob, Kevin and Steve, I'll share a little information from recentUltralight hot-rodding experiments by two ex-Navy sonar technicians, thatusually prefer to work in secret (Steve R. and me).

John: Thanks for the FCC link- bookmarked it. Will check out NRC. I appreciate your help, and the warm welcome here! rob <bjohnorcas@...> wrote: three of best for constantly by my from clubs

John: Last week I looked up WRTH 2009 annual and was not out yet- will check again online. I did go to bookstore that had Passport to World Radio 2009- but was ALL SW stuff. I have noted the links

Rob, I absolutely love my DT-400W! I started out with the SRF-59, then got the ultralight bug in a big way and purchased the SRF-M37V. Not satisfied with its wide selectivity against my local

Kevin: Appreciate the clarification of the M37- live in urban area (Buffalo,NY area) and have second home 10 miles away- probably not far enough. And have not soldered in 40 years! May get back to

I've been at the dials quite a bit the past few days and my ULR log has jumped nicely and I am steadily closing in on 300 stations heard. Here is my latest batch of ULR loggings with barefoot Sony

Since I returned to Oklahoma from Washington state atThanksgiving, I've been enjoying domestic MWDX for the first time since1959-60, via Ultralighting, Unlimited Class. I had competed in

Hi Rob: While the M37V is not the worst selectivity-wise (the true "F" in this category is a Radio shack portable currently available, which is so bad it only tunes in about 8 different stations, one

John and Rob, A word of warning about radio-locator.com: Their database of Canadian stations is extremely out of date. In the first 200 stations they list for Ontario, I found 13 errors. These are