|
Re: Tescum Pl-210 Alignment Instructions or Schematic Needed
Frequency counter, or *generator*?
Frequency counter, or *generator*?
|
By
Gabriel Velez
·
#21435
·
|
|
Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review
Op 26-06-13 01:32, RichardA schreef:
Somebody can tell the difference between R2001D and this Shouyu:
http://swling.com/blog/2013/06/new-product-the-shouyu-sy-x5-shortwave-radio/
can you eg tune
Op 26-06-13 01:32, RichardA schreef:
Somebody can tell the difference between R2001D and this Shouyu:
http://swling.com/blog/2013/06/new-product-the-shouyu-sy-x5-shortwave-radio/
can you eg tune
|
By
Marc Coevoet
·
#21434
·
|
|
Re: Tescum Pl-210 Alignment Instructions or Schematic Needed
In addition, this kind of adjustment is best accomplished with a properly attached frequency counter. In many instances, there is no better or more accurate substitute.
Joe
In addition, this kind of adjustment is best accomplished with a properly attached frequency counter. In many instances, there is no better or more accurate substitute.
Joe
|
By
josephrot
·
#21433
·
|
|
Tescum Pl-210 Alignment Instructions or Schematic Needed
I just received my new Tescum Pl-210 and I noticed that it is off frequency and also probably needs to be re-aligned. In my opinion most of the Chinese manufactured radio are mass produced and their
I just received my new Tescum Pl-210 and I noticed that it is off frequency and also probably needs to be re-aligned. In my opinion most of the Chinese manufactured radio are mass produced and their
|
By
maxyhopy
·
#21432
·
|
|
Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review
Correction, the message should read: My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches, the R-2010D "does not" meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.
Correction, the message should read: My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches, the R-2010D "does not" meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.
|
By
bbwrwy
·
#21431
·
|
|
Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review
My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches,
the R-2010D does meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.
Richard.
Richard Allen
near Perry OK USA.
My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches,
the R-2010D does meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.
Richard.
Richard Allen
near Perry OK USA.
|
By
bbwrwy
·
#21430
·
|
|
Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review
It's too bad Tecsun left out the switchable IF filters. Many of their small DSP models can select from 5 bandwidths, which is a very useful feature.
It's too bad Tecsun left out the switchable IF filters. Many of their small DSP models can select from 5 bandwidths, which is a very useful feature.
|
By
Gary Kinsman
·
#21429
·
|
|
Re: Returned mail: User unknown
What does this mean?
Sent from an unknown user ???
I have been getting this daily !
Michael UK
What does this mean?
Sent from an unknown user ???
I have been getting this daily !
Michael UK
|
By
Michael <michael.setaazul@...>
·
#21428
·
|
|
Returned mail: User unknown
The original message was received at 2013-06-25 05:51:53 -0400
from postoffice.westell.com [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<thomashuber@...>
The original message was received at 2013-06-25 05:51:53 -0400
from postoffice.westell.com [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<thomashuber@...>
|
By
thomashuber@...
·
#21427
·
|
|
Re: Tecsun 2010D - Back to Basics
Yeah, I'm coming to the conclusion that the digital tuning/analog dial radios are (so far) designed more for the casual listener than the hard-core radio enthusiast.
73s,
Keith B.
Seattle WA USA
Yeah, I'm coming to the conclusion that the digital tuning/analog dial radios are (so far) designed more for the casual listener than the hard-core radio enthusiast.
73s,
Keith B.
Seattle WA USA
|
By
keith beesley
·
#21426
·
|
|
Re: Tecsun 2010D - Back to Basics
The swling.com review answers my query re tuning increments.
So it does, indeed, appear that this receiver is not a good choice. Possibly because it is designed
primarily
for domestic listeners who
The swling.com review answers my query re tuning increments.
So it does, indeed, appear that this receiver is not a good choice. Possibly because it is designed
primarily
for domestic listeners who
|
By
Michael <michael.setaazul@...>
·
#21425
·
|
|
Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review
That is certainly not promising. I hope selectivity can be adjusted, and it was just not set up correctly on his particular radio. - FARMERIK
That is certainly not promising. I hope selectivity can be adjusted, and it was just not set up correctly on his particular radio. - FARMERIK
|
By
Rik
·
#21424
·
|
|
Re: FM Log # 500
Thank you for your congratulatory messages.
I do live in a good location for FM DX. On Saturday morning I was receiving station from east Texas, one was 518 km (322 mi) away. There are no mountains
Thank you for your congratulatory messages.
I do live in a good location for FM DX. On Saturday morning I was receiving station from east Texas, one was 518 km (322 mi) away. There are no mountains
|
By
bbwrwy
·
#21423
·
|
|
A Tecsun R-2010D review
http://swling.com/blog/2013/06/a-review-of-the-tecsun-r-2010d-shortwave-radio/
http://swling.com/blog/2013/06/a-review-of-the-tecsun-r-2010d-shortwave-radio/
|
By
Gary Kinsman
·
#21422
·
|
|
Re: FM Log # 500
Richard,
Congratulations on receiving FM station #500 on ultralight radios-- an amazing accomplishment. It's great that you live in such a favorable location for the chase, and can enjoy FM-DX on
Richard,
Congratulations on receiving FM station #500 on ultralight radios-- an amazing accomplishment. It's great that you live in such a favorable location for the chase, and can enjoy FM-DX on
|
By
Gary DeBock
·
#21421
·
|
|
Re: FM Log # 500
RE:
Yesterday during a skip I logged station #500 on an ultralight radio.
6/23/13
1524 UTC 92.1 MHz WLTQ-FM, Venice FL (1744 km/1084 mi) on a barefoot Tecsun PL-310ET
RE:
Yesterday during a skip I logged station #500 on an ultralight radio.
6/23/13
1524 UTC 92.1 MHz WLTQ-FM, Venice FL (1744 km/1084 mi) on a barefoot Tecsun PL-310ET
|
By
Allen Willie
·
#21420
·
|
|
Re: ULR FM station #500 & more.
Congratulations, Richard! Quite an accomplishment!
I don't have much luck with FM DX here in the cool, damp Northwest, but I'm trying. I usually get one or two every summer.
73 and good DX,
Keith
Congratulations, Richard! Quite an accomplishment!
I don't have much luck with FM DX here in the cool, damp Northwest, but I'm trying. I usually get one or two every summer.
73 and good DX,
Keith
|
By
keith beesley
·
#21419
·
|
|
ULR FM station #500 & more.
Yesterday during a skip I logged station #500 on an ultralight radio.
6/23/13
1524 UTC 92.1 MHz WLTQ-FM, Venice FL (1744 km/1084 mi) on a barefoot Tecsun PL-310ET receiceiver.
Sporadic E propagation
Yesterday during a skip I logged station #500 on an ultralight radio.
6/23/13
1524 UTC 92.1 MHz WLTQ-FM, Venice FL (1744 km/1084 mi) on a barefoot Tecsun PL-310ET receiceiver.
Sporadic E propagation
|
By
bbwrwy
·
#21418
·
|
|
Returned mail: User unknown
The original message was received at 2013-06-24 06:50:44 -0400
from postoffice.westell.com [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<thomashuber@...>
The original message was received at 2013-06-24 06:50:44 -0400
from postoffice.westell.com [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<thomashuber@...>
|
By
thomashuber@...
·
#21417
·
|
|
Re: Tecsun 2010D - Back to Basics
By
Michael <michael.setaazul@...>
·
#21416
·
|