Conditions Improving
kirk74601 <kirk74601@...>
I know I'm usually invisible here, but believe me, I read everything
this great group has to offer. I want to thank you dedicated guys in guiding some of us non-tech types. I've noticed during the past week or so that conditions seem to be gradualy improving. Richard Allen recently commented to me that the pre-dawn time frame is working well down here. I definitely agree with him. This morning I was able to log R. Rebelde, 670 khz //5025 khz. The MW outlet was kicking some butt on the channel around 1015 UT. A new one for me. Then, I was quite surprised to hear and ID R. Enciclopedia, 530 khz from 1022-1100 UT. Crystal clear 100% copy on this one. Within the last week I managed to FINALLY log R. Reloj on 570 khz. They were all new ones for me. Congrats to Allen for some SERIOUS ULR DX'ing...Allen, do you ever sleep? Also to Tim, welcome to the nostalgic radio nuts hangout. I think all of us can relate with what you said in your last post. Kind of brings back fond memories! Take care guys, and Allen, don't forget to eat now and then...good luck on the challenge. I know you'll make it happen!
|
||
|
||
having fun w/Ultralight
Tim Davisson
Guys...The idea of DXing on a tiny, pocket, battery-powered
AM portable has reignited my interest in a 40+ year hobby of mine: AM DXing. It's akin to my ham radio QRP operating. I simply love it. SPR-59 barefoot from my home near Akron, Ohio. Log so far. 73's, Tim, KD8GZ Ultralight AM Logbook (by date) (SRF-59, unless noted otherwise) Satr. 8/30/08 620 WTMJ/Milwaukee, WI, 8:57pm EDT, Brewers pbp Satr. 8/30/08 620 WRJZ/Knoxville, TN, 9:00pm EDT, ID Satr. 8/30/08 580 WHB/Harrisburg, PA, 9:05pm EDT Satr. 8/30/08 940 CINW/Montreal, QUE., 9:20pm, "940 hits.com" Satr. 8/30/08 940 KPSZ/Des Moines, IA, 9:35pm, legal ID, Royals Satr. 8/30/08 990 CBW/Winnipeg, MAN, 9:59pm, "ID" Satr. 8/30/08 960 WFIR/Roanoke, VA, 10:05pm Tue. 9/2/08 590 WMBS/Uniontown, PA, 8:59pm ID, Pirates pbp Tue. 9/2/08 590 WVLK/Lexington, KY, 9:06pm, "news-talk 590" Tue. 9/2/08 790 CIGM/Sudbury, ONT, 9:20pm, Blue Jays pbp Tue. 9/2/08 1540 KXEL/Waterloo, IA, 9:29pm ID, Bruce Wms. Tue. 9/2/08 1360 WSAI/Cincinnati, OH, 9:41pm, ESPN network Tue. 9/2/08 1350 WOYK/York, PA, 9:44pm, Orioles pbp Wed. 9/3/08 1410 KQV/Pittsburgh, PA, 8:00pm EDT Wed. 9/3/08 1410 WHLN/Harlan, KY., 8:00pm EDT Wed. 9/3/08 1200 WRKK/Hughesvile, PA., 8:13pm EDT, Phillies pbp Wed. 9/3/08 920 CKNX/Wingham, ONT., 8:36pm EDT, Blue Jays Thur. 9/4/08 900 CHML/Hamilton, ONT., 6:20am EDT Thur. 9/4/08 920 WTCW/Whitesburg, KY., 6:24am EDT Thur. 9/4/08 820 WBAP/Ft. Worth, TX., 6:52am EDT Thur. 9/4/08 920 WMMN/Fairmont, WV., 7:02am EDT #
|
||
|
||
Re: E100
John H. Bryant <bjohnorcas@...>
Dennis,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Keep your fingers crossed. I was pretty clear in my write up of this situation, posted here, that the Durham Store would ATTEMPT to provide the "old" version of the E100, IF THE DXER REQUESTED SUCH AT THE TIME OF ORDERING. They were also pretty clear that they were under no obligation if no such request was made. Gee, I hope that you requested the Old Version and that it was from the Canadian crew at Durham. In either case, it appears that the newer version is rather rare, so..... John B.
At 08:13 PM 9/3/2008 -0700, you wrote:
Is it fair to assume that Durham Radio and their US outlet The Shortwave Store are aware of the "new and improved" E100 that really isn't and that for ULR purposes the original version is what we want? I ordered one from their US outlet The Shortwave Store via the link on dxer.ca a couple of days ago to get the special price. Hopefully I'll get the old version.
|
||
|
||
E100
Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@...>
Is it fair to assume that Durham Radio and their US outlet The
Shortwave Store are aware of the "new and improved" E100 that really
isn't and that for ULR purposes the original version is what we want? I
ordered one from their US outlet The Shortwave Store via the link on
dxer.ca a couple of days ago to get the special price. Hopefully I'll get
the old version.
73
|
||
|
||
Re: SRF-59 tuning knob modification
ronshire2000
excellent picture Richard. i will have to do that to the one i have
open. i had thought of doing something like that but hadn't attempted it yet. i was imagining that it might make a mess of the case but the way you did it, it looks like it was made that way. possibly some lubricant or silicone sprayed into the capacitor may make it work easier Ron One of my complaints about the SRF-59 receiver has been the difficulthttp://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/ultralightdx/photos/view/5165?b=7.
|
||
|
||
SRF-39FP on eBay for $39!
Brett Saylor <bds2@...>
|
||
|
||
SRF-59 tuning knob modification
bbwrwy
One of my complaints about the SRF-59 receiver has been the difficult
to use tuning knob. Looking at the SRF-39FP, it was evident more of its tuning knob was exposed. So I decided to see if I could improve the SRF-59. Using a small hobby file I carefully remove some of the plastic from the case. Now it's a little easier for my arthritic thumb to turn the tuning dial. There is a photo at http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/ultralightdx/photos/view/5165?b=7. Now if I can figure what can be done about the stiff turning variable capacitor. Richard Allen
|
||
|
||
Re: High-Q Mini-Loop for Ultralights
Gary Kinsman
Hi Kevin,
Your "ultralight loop" sounds great. Maybe you should go into business selling them. Can you post a picture of it next to an E100 or a DT-200VX (for scale)? And thanks for the tip on using the Q-Stick with the E100. I'll give it a try. I agree that properly positioning the Q-Stick with the ultralights is difficult. Regards, Gary --- In ultralightdx@..., "dhsatyadhana" <satya@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: wonderful conditions last 3 days
At 09:35 AM 9/3/2008 -0700, you wrote:
Some of the logs as follows: WOW...amazing stuff Alan!!! We're gonna have to change the Award Name to the "ALAN WILLIE 10 Day Challenge!!". I haven't done too much AM BCB Dxing yet this Season....as the FM Band has been going nuts....and I've been spending a lot of time DXing FM Tropo Conditions!! I'm gonna have to get busy!! Keep up the good work!! 73........ROB. Robert S. Ross VA3SW London, Ontario CANADA Antique/Vintage Radio Enthusiast Amateur Radio Stations VA3SW/VE3JFC Defy Physics.....Play Table Tennis!! (Ping Pong with an Attitude) «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
|
||
|
||
wonderful conditions last 3 days
Allen Willie
|
||
|
||
Re: Case for DT-200VX or DT-400W
Steve Ponder <n5wbi@...>
Ron,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In certain climates (like our crazy climate here in Houston), wouldn't static buildup/discharge be a concern with the cotton and the plastic case rubbing/ sliding together? I'd be afraid I'd damage the radio somehow ... 73, Steve N5WBI Houston TX
my quite inexpensive solution to the case problem
|
||
|
||
Re: High-Q Mini-Loop for Ultralights
dhsatyadhana <satya@...>
Hey Gary:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I've got the Quantum Stick as well - very nice for travel, and LW to boot, plus it acts as a coupler. As you say, for some reason it doesn't seem to do much for certain receivers - I get something on my Eton e100, but not as much as I would expect. In fact, with most of my Ultralights, the positioning seems to be the key - very finicky to find the right position. Try putting the Q-Stick on the side of the receiver such that the ferrite of the Q-Stick is in-line with the ferrite in the e100 - this adjacent orientation seems to work better than when the Q-Stick and receiver are face-to-face. In comparing the Q-Stick and my home-brew just now with a variety of ULRs and the Sony 7600GR, the gain and tuning sharpness on the home- brew was substantially greater, often the difference between mumbling audio and discernable reception, so it's become an instant accessory in my ULR arsenal. 73 - Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA
|
||
|
||
Re: Case for DT-200VX or DT-400W
ronshire2000
my quite inexpensive solution to the case problem has been solved by
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
utilizing some old half socks that are too worn for wearing but make a nice cotton cocoon for these little radios and pack nicely as i travel on the weekends. if you like more protection just use 2 socks
Has anyone found a nice compact case for the DT-200VX or DT-400W? I
|
||
|
||
Re: High-Q Mini-Loop for Ultralights
Gary Kinsman
Hello all,
As another alternative "portable" MW antenna for ultralights, the Quantum Q-Stick works well with the DT-200VX (and presumably with the DT-400W). Unfortunately, it doesn't do much at all with the E100, which is a shame. It also works well with the larger E10 and 7600GR. Regards, Gary --- In ultralightdx@..., "dhsatyadhana" <satya@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: DT-400W
lrdheat
--- On Tue, 9/2/08, Richard Berler wrote: From: Richard Berler
|
||
|
||
DT-400W
lrdheat
|
||
|
||
Re: Stock Sangean DT-400W Receives 6 TP's at Grayland
Gary Kinsman
Hi Dennis,
I bought my Fry's refurb E10 in August 2007. Other than a "jumpy" tuning knob, similar to that on my E100, I'm pretty happy with it. I generally use external chargers for all of my rechargeable batteries. The Maha charger that I have charges each cell individually, which can't be done if I charge them inside a radio (in this case they are all charged in series). Once one of the Eton 1100 mAh NiMH batteries went belly up, with corrosion showing on the positive terminal of the battery, I started using a set of PowerEx 2300 mAh NiMH batteries that I bought for my PRO-96 scanner. It's possible that alkaline batteries, with their higher voltage, may provide better performance. This is true with the 7600GR -- the sync lock is better with a higher voltage. I agree that the E10 is not worth $130, but at $30 I couldn't pass it up. The 7600GR is more sensitive on MW, but the E10 seems a bit more sensitive on SW. The E10 has far better sound quality than the 7600GR, but the latter is much more selective, with the selectable- sideband sync detector and a true SSB mode. A combination of the E10 and the 7600GR would make a fine compact radio. Adding a good sync detector to the E5/G5 would make a very nice unit as well. Let me know if your E100 has any funny "hets" around 640 kHz (see my other post). They seem to be internal to my unit (birdies), not due to external signals. Regards, Gary --- In ultralightdx@..., "Dennis Gibson" <wb6tnb@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Second DT-400W Came Today!
Steve Ponder N5WBI <n5wbi@...>
The DT-400W that I ordered from NewEgg came today. I plan to use the
new one as a spare, in case my original one decides to go bonkers. I will, however, set it up and use it, but just not all the time like I do my original one. I used my original DT-400W all the time during our Hurricane Gustav alert to monitor WWL 870 New Orleans. Fantastic reception, even during broad daylight here in Houston! Question - my original DT-400W is serial # 84011036. The one that came today is serial # 84011190. I know that several DXers in this group have this radio - have any of you noticed any issues with yours that are in the same general S/N range as mine are? Just wondering. Thanks & 73, Steve N5WBI Houston TX
|
||
|
||
High-Q Mini-Loop for Ultralights
dhsatyadhana <satya@...>
Hi all:
I just posted a couple photos of a recent project on the UltraLight DX Yahoo group. I recently got a high-Q basketweave loop on eBay from the seller "noseknowsnose". It's a 3.5" Litz coil with a Q around 800. I popped it into a small plastic box designed for old PC diskettes, used double-stick foam tape to put a 2x260 variable cap on, and Voila! I stuffed some tissue in the box to keep the coil from bouncing around - really high-tech at this point... The high Q of the loop really adds tuning sharpness to UltraLights, making it easier to shade one sideband over the other or notch a pest out of the way. The gain is pretty good as well. 73 - Kevin S Bainbridge Island, WA
|
||
|
||
Re: DT-400W
Hello Richard,
Thanks for your comments on your new
DT-400W. Actually, the DT-400W's usual strong point is good sensitivity
all across the band, not that it is far more sensitive than most models on any
given frequency. Its predecessor, the DT-200VX, usually has a drop
off in sensitivity either on high band or low band (mine and yours drops off on
high band), and all other digital models commonly have a similar
sensitivity drop-off (low band for the E100, high band for the SRF-T615,
etc). Accordingly, Sangean's effort to improve wide-band sensitivity by
redesigning the DT-400W's RF board is commendable, and makes it possible for a
DXer to enjoy competitive sensitivity from 530-1710 kHz in a single model.
Also, Grayland is an exceptional ocean beach
location which can make almost any portable perform like a champ. Even
though the DT-400W received 6 TP's and made two great mp3's (from Thailand
and S. Korea) last Friday, if I tried the same thing at home in Puyallup
(only 80 air miles to the east), it probably would have been a miserable
failure. TA and TP DXers know that an ocean beach is fantastic for DX, and
that's why they return there over and over. Even the very tiny SRF-S84
(about half the size of the SRF-59) managed to receive a TP at Grayland
(JOUB-774), with multiple heterodynes (TP carriers) all over the band.
Here in Puyallup, I'll probably need fantastic propagation to have any hope of a
single TP on the SRF-S84.
73,
Gary . It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
|
||
|