Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Bill M <radioexray@...>
FWIW, I keep a LC calculator on my website. It comes in handy when I can't find my old timey cardboard Allied L/C Slide Rule :)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
http://www.sparkbench.com/LC.htm -Bill gkinsman1 wrote:
Hi Kevin,
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Kevin S <satya@...>
Happy to help - let me know if you need any more info, or when you get it
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
built! Kevin
Hi Kevin,
|
|
Re: PL-210 DSP or not?
Harold
Thanks Tao,
Harold
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Gary Kinsman
Hi Kevin,
Yes, this is very helpful. The equation and example you provided are exactly what I was looking for. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer all of my questions today, as well as providing sources for the loop element and tuning capacitor. I think I'll build one of these mini loops. Regards, Gary --- In ultralightdx@..., "Kevin S" <satya@...> wrote: capacitance" (i.e., the wires of the loop interacting with each other, acting as a capacitor). So, for a loop of say 250 uH with 20 pf distributed capacitance, in theory the cap would be 35 to 361, but with the 20 pf added capacitance of the loop, the required cap value would be 15 to 341. This is a typical range I've seen quoted.
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Kevin S <satya@...>
Hey Gary:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Here's a site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit About halfway down, under "Resonance Effect", is the formula: f = 1/((2*pi)*(sqrt(LC))) I have found the following to be much easier to use, which is a simple rearranging of the above equation: L*C*f*f = 25,330 f is in Mhz, L is uH (usually around 250) and C is in pf (usually 10-365 or some such). So, pick two of the values, and the third one pops out. For example, if L is 250 an you want to tune down to 530 khz, the require C value is 25,330/(250 * 0.53 * 0.53) = 361 pf. For an average project, you can figure 20 or so pf for "distributed capacitance" (i.e., the wires of the loop interacting with each other, acting as a capacitor). So, for a loop of say 250 uH with 20 pf distributed capacitance, in theory the cap would be 35 to 361, but with the 20 pf added capacitance of the loop, the required cap value would be 15 to 341. This is a typical range I've seen quoted. I just checked my little loop in the green box, and I did link the two sections of the cap together to make 532 pf max capacitance. With all that capacitance, it tunes down to 440 khz, and easily reaches 1700 khz on the high end. The beauty of the Litz coil is that it has very little distributed capacitance owing to the winding pattern, so your high end (>1700 khz) is not endangered. Hope this helps - Kevin
Thanks for the info, Kevin.
|
|
Re: PL-210 DSP or not?
Tao Qu
Both the PL-210 and RP2100 are digital PLL based design, no
DSP inside.
- Tao Qu From: ultralightdx@... [mailto:ultralightdx@...] On Behalf Of farmerik Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 7:55 AM To: ultralightdx@... Subject: [ultralightdx] Re: PL-210 DSP or not? I noticed a seller who claimed the PL-210 and the RP-2100 are both DSP
radios. I think it is an error in translating. The PL-200 wasn't DSP and the
RP-2100 isn't either, but they are digitally tuned or at least have a digital
frequency read out. - FARMERIK
--- In ultralightdx@..., "surveyor6180" wrote: > > There seems to be be conflicting information regarding the 210. > Does anyone know for sure if it has DSP or not? > It looks like it could be an interesting radio and I am curious if it in fact does have DSP capability. > Thanks everyone, Harold >
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Rik
The order is placed and he says it will take about a week to make them. - FARMERIK
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., "farmerik" <farmerik@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Terminally ill PL-310 ... or not
bbwrwy
Bob:
Although the PL-310 receiver has been around just about a year now, it is still new enough that not much information is around for repairing one. I imagine the problem you're describing could also happen with a PL-300, 360 or 380. It's probably a simple component fault, which may or not be repairable. I have two of them. They are both perform well on the MW/LW and FM bands. But the newer of the two does not receive short wave signal. It appears the problem may be with external antenna input. Luckily, I don't need it for listening to short wave broadcasts. Hopefully you come upon a solution soon. Best of DX. Richard. Richard Allen 36°22'51"N / 97°26'35"W (near Perry OK USA)
|
|
Re: PL-210 DSP or not?
Rik
I noticed a seller who claimed the PL-210 and the RP-2100 are both DSP radios. I think it is an error in translating. The PL-200 wasn't DSP and the RP-2100 isn't either, but they are digitally tuned or at least have a digital frequency read out. - FARMERIK
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., "surveyor6180" <hmgaffney@...> wrote:
|
|
My 100th Pennsylvania UL Station- I Think...
John Cereghin <jcereghin@...>
After a few weeks of tracking a country station on 1210 under local mega-pest WPHT, I think I can finally add WANB-1210 in Waynesburg PA into the log. That makes 100 PA stations logged on my various ultralights, all barefoot.
New York (78 stations) and Virginia (76) stations are next, but still a long way to go! Now at 708 total UL stations. -- John Cereghin WDX3IAO KB3LYP Smyrna DE My radio page www.pilgrimway.org/dx The Ultralight Scoreboard www.pilgrimway.org/ulradio
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Rik
Thanks, I gave him those numbers, and asked for a quote for both. He mentioned an OD of 9,25 inches. I wouldn't expect this to be a long distance DXing antenna when it is so small, but it should be interesting. If anyone else is interested, we might get a better price if he sets up and makes several, or maybe not. If I get them, I'll report how they work on the PL-360, and I have a suitable cap to tune them for other radios too. - FARMERIK
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., D1028Gary@... wrote:
|
|
PL-210 DSP or not?
Harold
There seems to be be conflicting information regarding the 210.
Does anyone know for sure if it has DSP or not? It looks like it could be an interesting radio and I am curious if it in fact does have DSP capability. Thanks everyone, Harold
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Gary Kinsman
Thanks for the info, Kevin.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Pardon my ignorance, but where does the 90,175 pf*uH come from? Do you have any web sites that discuss this?
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Kevin S" <satya@...> wrote:
I think that's correct - I must have tied the two sections together to make a 532 pf lower end. Multiplying inductance times cpaacitance, you need about 90,175 pf*uH. Since the inductance of the coil is around 266 uH, that leaves 339 pF needed to get down to 530 khz.Since there is so little distributed capacitance in the Litz coil, tying the two cap sections together means that you should still be able to tune the top end.
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Kevin S <satya@...>
I think that's correct - I must have tied the two sections together to
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
make a 532 pf lower end. Multiplying inductance times cpaacitance, you need about 90,175 pf*uH. Since the inductance of the coil is around 266 uH, that leaves 339 pF needed to get down to 530 khz. Since there is so little distributed capacitance in the Litz coil, tying the two cap sections together means that you should still be able to tune the top end. Kevin
Thanks, Kevin.
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Gary Kinsman
That's where I saw it before. Thanks.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Kevin S" <satya@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Gary Kinsman
Thanks, Kevin.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I believe the coil seller said 365 pF is needed to tune down to 500 kHz. Perhaps your coil needed less capacitance than the one he currently offers.
--- In ultralightdx@..., "Kevin S" <satya@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Kevin S <satya@...>
If you want to see what the finished product looks like, download the
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
"Using Passive Loop Antennas" article and look for the picture of a little green box on page 5. I put it into a green plastic computer diskette filing box. The article is here on the group, and also here: www.am-dx.com/passiveloops.pdf Kevin
Thanks for the info, Kevin.
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Kevin S <satya@...>
I wanted a compact set-up, so I used a 2x266 mini variable capacitor from
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
"zlowe7", ebay item # 150275619877. As I recall I only needed to use one of the 266 pf sections to resonate the whole band. I think these are the same capacitors that are used in the Quantum Stick antenna. If you go this route, make sure you get the stems and knobs (I heartily recommend the large knobs, item #150275619937, for better fine-tuning control). I've ordered stuff from this guy a few times, and he ships quickly. He combines shipping, so ask for a final invoice amount if you order multiple items! Kevin
Thanks for the info, Kevin.
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Rik
I just sent the coil seller a message through Ebay to ask about making AM BCB and LW BCB coils for the PL-360. Don't worry Gary, I will want the long ferrite model you plan to offer too. If he asks, what inductance would the radio want for these two bands? - FARMERIK
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., "farmerik" <farmerik@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Small loop antenna -- Question for Kevin S.
Rik
It should connect to the PL-360 as is, and It would be great if he could optimize by making it larger for a little more signal pick up, and offer one for LW BCB. He has a number of choices of wire, and can make these up to or larger than 6 inches OD. HMMMM... - FARMERIK
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In ultralightdx@..., "gkinsman1" <gkinsman@...> wrote:
|
|