Re: Guy Atkin's Independent Testing of PL-380 7.5" Loopstick
sdwillingham
I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here. The chip's datasheet
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
indicates a range of inductance over which the chip's built-in varactor can successfully bring to resonance. This is neccessary, but not sufficient for calling the antenna "optimal". The choice of which inductance works "best" overall probably depends on several physical factors and usage patterns. But once chosen, the chip will automatically resonate the inductor, which eliminates the factory alignment procedure which has historically been needed. I don't think the inductance spec should be read as indicating that all inductances will perform equivalently; only that all within range can be resonated. As for the chip tuning inductors outside the specified range, please recognize that a datasheet is a guarantee of performance. In the case of integrated circuits, it is critical that a vanishingly small number of them fall outside the datasheet parameters when deployed in the field. No manufacturer can afford to scrap complex devices when one of many chips inside fail to perform as specified. So the numbers in a datasheet are all conservative, some are very much so. -Scott-
---------- Forwarded message ---------- The SiLab Si4734 chip's datasheet indicates an acceptable 180-450 uH
|
|