Re: Sangean DT-400W...

Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@...>

I have a DT-200-vx which I purchased back at the beginning of the ULR days. I've
found it to be of inferior selectivity - to the point that I mostly use it only as a
spotting receiver in conjunction with my SRF-59. Any reasonably strong signal
adjacent swamps it, and sometimes even strong second adjacents do as well.

Russ Edmunds
15 mi NNW of Philadelphia
Grid FN20id


On Sat, 4/5/14, Stephen Ponder <> wrote:

Subject: Re: [ultralightdx] Re: Sangean DT-400W...
Date: Saturday, April 5, 2014, 12:12 AM


I have
two DT-400W radios. Evidently they are the
"older" models because they do not have the "Public Alert"
logo on the front that is shown on the Sangean web page.
I've used my first one so much that the labels on the
buttons have almost totally rubbed off!

I purchased the CC Pocket Radio just after
Christmas last year because I wanted an ultralight radio
similar in design to the DT-400W, but with selectable
bandwidth (2.5/10 kHz) and tuning steps (1/10 kHz). Having
selectable memory pages was an added benefit, too.

HOWEVER - I've noticed in the past month or
so that the last one or two digits in the display of the CC
Pocket Radio are beginning to go bad. The numbers are
fading out and hard to read. ALSO, the radio's speaker
has gone pretty much DOA. This doesn't
affect my DX'ing, since I always use
earbuds/headphones. But, for a radio that costs as much as
the CC Pocket Radio did, I would expect a better-quality
speaker. On a side note, the volume thumbwheel has become
scratchy, but I think that can be resolved with some contact

I've been using the Sangean DT-200V lately
for my late-night DX'ing. It has its drawbacks, but it
holds its own. It's no slouch.

Has anybody else had problems with their CC
Pocket Radio? Would it be beneficial to contact CCrane?


73 Good DX,

"In theory,
there is no difference between theory and practice. But in
there is." - Yogi Berra, Bench Coach, Houston Astros,

Sent from Yahoo! Mail for
Windows 8

From: Powell E. Way>
Sent: ‎Fri, ‎Apr‎
‎4‎, ‎2014 at ‎10‎:‎40‎ ‎PM
Subject: Re:
[ultralightdx] Re: Sangean DT-400W...

I have one. There's no room for a MP3
recorder function, and if they could it would make the price
a lot higher. The CC SW Pocket is as sensitive, and has
better audio, but you have to be much slower on tuner



Sent: Friday, April 4,
2014 11:49 AM
Subject: [ultralightdx]
Re: Sangean DT-400W...

Have indeed been seeing more references to and
positive comments on the new(er) Sangean DT-400W pocket
receiver. FYI Sangean USA
website page:

A neat little package with
capable performance, fairly sensitive, useful features, and
with decent sound quality to boot.

Of course, if it only added a nice MP-3
recorder function with SD slot... but perhaps that would
have been a bit of 20/20 hindsight...:)...

Joe Rotello / Knoxville, TN /

Join to automatically receive all group messages.