Re: A Tecsun R-2010D review


bbwrwy
 

Correction, the message should read: My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches, the R-2010D "does not" meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.

--- In ultralightdx@yahoogroups.com, "RichardA" <richarda@...> wrote:

My recommendation is to select one of the small DSP models. At 38.95 cubic inches,
the R-2010D does meet the definition of an ultralight receiver.

Richard.

Richard Allen
near Perry OK USA.

Join main@UltralightDX.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.