Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your comments.
One of the reasons why this loopstick
experimentation (both Slider and monster composite bars) is so fascinating is
that you never really know what will happen, until you transplant your fanatical
creations into a new radio design. You can have a phenomenal technical
breakthrough (like the slider E100's and slider DT-200VX), or the biggest
technical dud in recent history, like the ICF-S5W. Although I've
never been to a casino, the feelings of anticipation must be about the
same.
The ICF-S5W's stock loopstick is 6 1/4" x
3/8", so it's pretty close to the transplant size (that is, not a huge
difference like the E100, or DT-200VX). The ICF-S5W is completely
unimpressed by the Slider function, with all frequencies optimized within
about 1/10 inch, and changing mostly in audio, not signal strength.
Having performed about 15 alignments on the ICF-S5 (W) series radios, I was
kind of worried this might happen, since peaking the coil on 600 kHz was mainly
an audio judgement call, and not a sharp signal strength peak. The best
Slider results are obtained when an alignment shows a razor-sharp peak on the
600 kHz weak station (i.e. the E100, DT-200VX, and C.Crane SWP turkey units),
making a sliding coil system critical in "spreading out the sensitivity" over
the entire AM band.
The ICF-S5W's stock 455 kHz IF filter is not bad
for the basic portable genre, and it can be replaced by the Murata CFJ455K5
premium filter for razor-sharp selectivity (at the expense of its great audio
fidelity, however). But an analog radio like the ICF-S5W is never going to
be the first choice of transoceanic DXers, no matter how selective. A
Slider E100 will run circles around it, because of the digital tuning and
memories.
The ICF-2010 and ICF-SW7600GR stock portables both
have fixed loopstick coil systems, and cannot accept a Slider
system. Both of them respond well to larger, composite ferrite bars,
however (the 30" loopstick ICF-2010 is "King of the Hill" here).
Anyway, loopstick experimentation is a fun way
to spend the Puget Sound deep freeze :>)
73, Gary
In a message dated 12/21/2008 11:05:53 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
satya@... writes:
Hey
Gary:
Thanks for delving into this project, even though the results
were less
than exhilarating. Your experimentation is a big part of
what makes this
hobby keep growing!
Does the Amidon version benefit
at all from being able to tweak the
position of the sliding coil, or is the
stock unit well-matched to the
stock ferrite antenna up & down the
band?
I think you had mentioned before that the filters in the S5W were
not able
to be changed out, so perhaps the S5W is as good as it will ever
be. The
engineers at Sony probably never guessed that something like
the Slider
e100 would make the sensitivity and selectivity on the S5W
seem....just
OK.
Praying the power stays on -
Kevin
> Hello Guys,
>
> Not
every loopstick transplant is amazingly successful-- some are a
>
lesson in humility.
>
> After carefully
creating a 7.5" Amidon ferrite bar loopstick wound
> with
>
40/44 Litz wire matching the ICF-S5W stock inductances (on two
coils),
> and
> painstakingly threading the four Litz wires
through a tiny hole so they
> wouldn't snarl the dial string, the
net result was.... exactly the same
> sensitivity as the
stock unit!
>
> With amazing successes in the
E100 and DT-200VX Ulttralights, the
> overconfident transplant
tech was probably in need of a lesson in
> humility, and
it
> certainly was delivered-- big time.
>
>
So now it's back to refining the E100 and DT-200VX Slider
radios,
> both
> of which have managed to thrill everyone who has
tried them. With a deep
> freeze here, there should be time
enough for many fanatical technical
>
projects.
>
> 73, Gary
DeBock
>
>
> **************One site keeps you connected to
all your email: AOL Mail,
> Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now.
>
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)
>